Comparison of three methods for measuring psoriasis severity in clinical studies (Part 1 of 2): change during therapy in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Static Physician's Global Assessment and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment

Background Accurate and reliable assessment of changes in psoriasis severity is critical in clinical trials of therapies. Objective To compare Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA), and the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS‐PGA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2015-07, Vol.29 (7), p.1406-1414
Hauptverfasser: Chow, C., Simpson, M.J., Luger, T.A., Chubb, H., Ellis, C.N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Accurate and reliable assessment of changes in psoriasis severity is critical in clinical trials of therapies. Objective To compare Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA), and the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS‐PGA) in a trial of systemic treatments for plaque psoriasis vulgaris and to assess whether they measure change in psoriasis induced by therapy. Methods Patients were randomized to voclosporin or cyclosporine for 24 weeks (the ‘24‐week‐treatment’ group, n = 366), or placebo for 12 weeks followed by voclosporin for 12 weeks (the ‘initial‐placebo’ group, n = 89). Results All scoring systems changed in concert and were sensitive enough to detect reductions in severity during placebo therapy as well as with active therapy (P 
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.13132