Comparison of three methods for measuring psoriasis severity in clinical studies (Part 1 of 2): change during therapy in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Static Physician's Global Assessment and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment
Background Accurate and reliable assessment of changes in psoriasis severity is critical in clinical trials of therapies. Objective To compare Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA), and the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS‐PGA...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2015-07, Vol.29 (7), p.1406-1414 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Accurate and reliable assessment of changes in psoriasis severity is critical in clinical trials of therapies.
Objective
To compare Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA), and the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS‐PGA) in a trial of systemic treatments for plaque psoriasis vulgaris and to assess whether they measure change in psoriasis induced by therapy.
Methods
Patients were randomized to voclosporin or cyclosporine for 24 weeks (the ‘24‐week‐treatment’ group, n = 366), or placebo for 12 weeks followed by voclosporin for 12 weeks (the ‘initial‐placebo’ group, n = 89).
Results
All scoring systems changed in concert and were sensitive enough to detect reductions in severity during placebo therapy as well as with active therapy (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0926-9959 1468-3083 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jdv.13132 |