Intravenous ivabradine for control of heart rate during coronary CT angiography: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract Background Low heart rates (HRs) are preferable for coronary CT angiography (CTA). We evaluated the use of an intravenous bolus of ivabradine, a selective sinus node inhibitor, to lower HR before coronary CTA in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography 2015-07, Vol.9 (4), p.286-294
Hauptverfasser: Cademartiri, Filippo, MD, PhD, Garot, Jerome, MD, Tendera, Michal, MD, PhD, Zamorano, Jose Luis, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Low heart rates (HRs) are preferable for coronary CT angiography (CTA). We evaluated the use of an intravenous bolus of ivabradine, a selective sinus node inhibitor, to lower HR before coronary CTA in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Methods A total of 370 patients scheduled for CTA, with sinus rhythm ≥70 beats/min but ineligible for intravenous beta-blockers, were randomized to an intravenous bolus of 10 mg (HR, 70–79 beats/min) or 15 mg (HR ≥80 beats/min) ivabradine or placebo. Primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving HR ≤65 beats/min at the initiation of coronary CTA (Ta). Results Baseline HR was 79 ± 8.5 beats/min. At Ta, HR ≤65 beats/min was achieved in 55% of the ivabradine group vs 23% for placebo ( P < .0001) and in 68% vs 16% 1-hour after bolus administration ( P < .0001). Contrast-enhanced coronary CTA was performed in 87% of the ivabradine group vs 65% for placebo ( P < .0001). Mean HR at Ta was 67 ± 10 beats/min for ivabradine vs 75 ± 10 beats/min for placebo ( P < .0001). Procedural convenience was scored better with ivabradine (“good” or “very good” in 79% vs 63% for placebo; P  = .0005). The effective radiation dose of contrast-enhanced CTA was 13 ± 7 mSv for ivabradine vs 16 ± 7 mSv for placebo ( P < .05). Ivabradine was well tolerated. Conclusions An intravenous bolus of ivabradine achieves rapid, safe, and sustained HR lowering during coronary CTA, increasing procedural convenience and reducing radiation exposure vs placebo.
ISSN:1934-5925
1876-861X
DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2015.04.005