Decision-making in female fertility preservation is balancing the expected burden of fertility preservation treatment and the wish to conceive

STUDY QUESTION What are the decisive factors in fertility preservation (FP) decision-making in young women scheduled for gonadotoxic therapy? SUMMARY ANSWER FP decision-making in young women scheduled for gonadotoxic therapy is mainly based on weighing two issues: the intensity of the wish to concei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2015-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1625-1634
Hauptverfasser: Baysal, Ö., Bastings, L., Beerendonk, C.C.M., Postma, S.A.E., IntHout, J., Verhaak, C.M., Braat, D.D.M., Nelen, W.L.D.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:STUDY QUESTION What are the decisive factors in fertility preservation (FP) decision-making in young women scheduled for gonadotoxic therapy? SUMMARY ANSWER FP decision-making in young women scheduled for gonadotoxic therapy is mainly based on weighing two issues: the intensity of the wish to conceive a child in the future and the expected burden of undergoing FP treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Future fertility is of importance for young cancer patients whose reproductive function is being threatened by oncological therapy. To prevent or reduce severe psychological effects of infertility as well as feelings of regret about their FP decision after cancer treatment, the quality of fertility preservation counselling (FPC) should be improved. To improve care, those issues forming a decisive factor in FP decision-making for patients should be clarified, as these issues deserve extensive discussion during FPC. Until now, decisive factors have not been isolated from the complex interplay of all aspects of FP that women contemplate during FP decision-making. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION By using a mixed methods methodology, a questionnaire developed after qualitative research involving a selected group of five women who previously received FPC was retrospectively sent to eligible patients (n = 143) who had received FPC (1999 – July 2013) and to whom at least one FP option was offered. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients had received FPC at a university hospital in the Netherlands, in a setting where financial factors do not play a role in FP. They were aged ≥16 years and were scheduled for gonadotoxic treatment. The relationship between patients' baseline characteristics, their attributed importance to 28 relevant importance items and their FP choices was investigated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE After five interviews, 28 importance items for FP decision-making were identified and included in our questionnaire. Of these 28 importance items, 24 items could be clustered into seven importance themes. A total of 87 patients (61%) responded to our questionnaire. After performing a multivariable logistic regression analysis, proceeding with FP was related to higher attributed importance during FP decision-making to the theme ‘Wish to conceive (in the future)’ (odds ratio (OR) 10.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5–34.4) and the item ‘Having a stable partner relationship’ (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0–4.1), while higher attributed importance to the theme ‘Ex
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dev116