Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Nuclear Medicine May Be Overestimated

Abstract Although the International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection’s definition of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) does not include nuclear imaging as part of the diagnostic criteria, many contemporary nuclear imaging studies are reporting exceptional results in PJI diagnos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2015-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1044-1049
Hauptverfasser: Diaz-Ledezma, Claudio, MD, Lamberton, Courtney, BS, Lichstein, Paul, MD, Parvizi, Javad, MD, FRCS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Although the International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection’s definition of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) does not include nuclear imaging as part of the diagnostic criteria, many contemporary nuclear imaging studies are reporting exceptional results in PJI diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review of studies published from 2004 to 2012 reporting the accuracy of nuclear imaging for diagnosis of PJI, utilizing a specially designed tool (QUADAS-2) for critical appraisal and investigation of bias. Our results revealed high risk of bias as well as high levels of concern regarding the clinical applicability of these tests in a majority of the studies. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that the use of nuclear imaging for diagnosis of PJI be limited to a few select cases.
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.008