A multicentre audit of GDPs knowledge of orthodontic retention
Key Points Presents the findings of a national audit on GDP knowledge of orthodontic retention. Looks at the potential barriers for the provision of replacement retainers in primary care. Highlights the need for improved communication between the orthodontist and GDP. Objective To determine GDP know...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British dental journal 2015-06, Vol.218 (11), p.649-653 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Key Points
Presents the findings of a national audit on GDP knowledge of orthodontic retention.
Looks at the potential barriers for the provision of replacement retainers in primary care.
Highlights the need for improved communication between the orthodontist and GDP.
Objective
To determine GDP knowledge and willingness to supervise orthodontic retention and provide replacements retainers.
Design
An audit sampling GDPs from six centres within England (Bradford, Cambridge, Burton-Upon-Trent, Croyden, Norwich and Plymouth). A gold standard of 100% of GDPs should be aware of commonly used retainers and be able to provide replacements was selected.
Method
Overall, 1,053 postal questionnaires were sent to local GDPs. The questions covered knowledge and provision of various retainers, practitioner background and education. GDP satisfaction with the information provided by the orthodontist at discharge was also explored.
Results
Five hundred and two questionnaires were received (response rate of 48%). The majority of GDPs (64%) were trained in the UK. Awareness of vacuum-formed, Hawley and fixed retainers was generally high. A significantly smaller number of GDPs were willing to prescribe, fit or review the retainers. The most common reasons for reluctance in provision were insufficient knowledge, financial and time constraints. Over two thirds (72%) of GDPs would like further training on retention.
Conclusion
This audit highlights a need for increased training at undergraduate and postgraduate levels to update practitioners about contemporary retention practice. Better communication is required from orthodontists to GDPs to ensure that on discharge the dentist is aware of the retainer type and retention regime. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0610 1476-5373 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.505 |