Cognitive impairments are different in single-incidence and multi-incidence ADHD families

Background We may improve our understanding of the role of common versus unique risk factors in attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by examining ADHD‐related cognitive deficits in single‐ (SPX), and multi‐incidence (MPX) families. Given that individuals from multiplex (MPX) families are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 2015-07, Vol.56 (7), p.782-791
Hauptverfasser: Oerlemans, Anoek M., Hartman, Catharina A., de Bruijn, Yvette G.E., Franke, Barbara, Buitelaar, Jan K., Rommelse, Nanda N.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background We may improve our understanding of the role of common versus unique risk factors in attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by examining ADHD‐related cognitive deficits in single‐ (SPX), and multi‐incidence (MPX) families. Given that individuals from multiplex (MPX) families are likely to share genetic vulnerability for the disorder, whereas simplex (SPX) ADHD may be the result of sporadic (non‐)genetic causes unique to the patient, we hypothesized that cognitive impairments may be different in SPX and MPX ADHD as indicated by (a) the presence of cognitive deficits in MPX, but not SPX unaffected siblings and (b) dissimilar cognitive profiles in SPX and MPX ADHD patients. Methods Tasks measuring total IQ, verbal attention, executive functioning, motor functioning, and time estimation were administered to 31 SPX/264 MPX ADHD probands, 47 SPX/123 MPX unaffected siblings, and 263 controls, aged 6–19 years. Results SPX unaffected siblings were unimpaired compared to controls, except for verbal working memory, whereas MPX unaffected siblings showed impairments on most cognitive domains. The cognitive profiles of SPX and MPX probands were highly similar, except that verbal attention, response inhibition and motor control deficits were more pronounced in MPX probands, and ‐compared to their unaffected siblings‐ impairments in IQ, visual working memory and timing abilities were more pronounced in SPX cases. Conclusions Our results support the hypothesis that a partly different cognitive architecture may underlie SPX and MPX forms of ADHD, which becomes evident when contrasting cognitive performances within families. Cognitive factors underlying MPX forms of ADHD are familial, whereas nonfamilial in SPX ADHD. SPX‐MPX stratification may be a step forward in unraveling diverse causal pathways.
ISSN:0021-9630
1469-7610
DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12349