A three-dimensional multiphase flow model for assessing NAPL contamination in porous and fractured media, 2. Porous medium simulation examples

This paper discusses the verification and application of the three-dimensional (3-D) multiphase flow model presented by Huyakorn et al. (Part 1 in this issue) for assessing contamination due to subsurface releases of non-aqueous-phase liquids (NAPL's). Attention is focussed on situations involving one-, two- and three-dimensional flow through porous media. The model formulations and numerical schemes are tested for highly nonlinear field conditions. The utility and accuracy of various simplifications to certain simulation scenarios are assessed. Five simulation examples are included for demonstrative purposes. The first example verifies the model for vertical flow and compares the performance of the fully three-phase and the passive-air-phase formulations. Air-phase boundary conditions are noted to have considerable effects on simulation results. The second example verifies the model for cross-sectional analyses involving LNAPL and DNAPL migration. Finite-difference (5-point) and finite-element (9-point) spatial approximations are compared for different grid aspect ratios. Unless corrected, negative-transmissivity conditions were found to have undesirable impact on the finite-element solutions. The third example provides a model validation against laboratory experimental data on 5-spot water-flood treatment of oil reservoirs. The sensitivity to grid orientation is noted for the finite-difference schemes. The fourth example demonstrates model utility in characterizing the 3-D migration of LNAPL and DNAPL from surface sources. The final example present a modeling study of air sparging. Critical parameters affecting the performance of air-sparging system are examined. In general, the modeling results indicate sparging is more effective in water-retentive soils, and larger values of sparge influence radius may be achieved for certain anisotropic conditions.