Renal biomarkers for the prediction of cardiovascular disease
PURPOSE OF REVIEWChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Renal biomarkers might be valuable in predicting CVD. Investigation of these biomarkers may uncover some of the poorly understood mechanisms that link renal and CVD as well as aid in the modif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current opinion in cardiology 2015-07, Vol.30 (4), p.454-460 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PURPOSE OF REVIEWChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Renal biomarkers might be valuable in predicting CVD. Investigation of these biomarkers may uncover some of the poorly understood mechanisms that link renal and CVD as well as aid in the modification of disease and serve as a useful tool in diagnosing early disease and monitoring therapeutic responses. In this review we discuss the clinical utility of emerging and known renal biomarkers in predicting CVD.
RECENT FINDINGSPrior to adopting a biomarker into routine clinical practice, evidence-based laboratory medicine requires optimal technical and analytical performance, which is a prerequisite to have confidence in the result. Furthermore, an ideal biomarker should have evidence of its utility in predicting clinical, therapeutic and other health outcomes as well as proving its organizational impact and cost-effectiveness. The renal biomarkers that have been associated with CVD include cystatin C as a better marker of glomerular filtration than creatinine, albuminuria, neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin, a marker of acute kidney injury, fibroblast growth factor-23 and parathyroid hormone. Only urine albumin has been adopted into routine clinical practice.
SUMMARYOf all the renal biomarkers, only albumin is clearly associated with CVD. The other biomarkers are earlier in clinical development and the evidence base for their clinical utility needs to be expanded substantially before they can be adopted into routine practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-4705 1531-7080 |
DOI: | 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000177 |