Safe Limits of Contrast Vary With Hydration Volume for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography Among Patients With a Relatively Low Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

BACKGROUND—Few studies have investigated the safe limits of contrast to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) based on hydration data. We aimed to investigate the relative safe maximum contrast volume adjusted for hydration volume in a population with a relatively low risk of CIN. METHODS AND R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2015-06, Vol.8 (6)
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Yong, Chen, Ji-Yan, Tan, Ning, Zhou, Ying-Ling, Yu, Dan-Qing, Chen, Zhu-Jun, He, Yi-Ting, Liu, Yuan-Hui, Luo, Jian-Fang, Huang, Wen-Hui, Li, Guang, He, Peng-Cheng, Yang, Jun-Qing, Xie, Nian-Jin, Liu, Xiao-Qi, Yang, Da-Hao, Huang, Shui-Jin, Ye, Piao, Li, Hua-Long, Ran, Peng, Duan, Chong-Yang, Chen, Ping-Yan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND—Few studies have investigated the safe limits of contrast to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) based on hydration data. We aimed to investigate the relative safe maximum contrast volume adjusted for hydration volume in a population with a relatively low risk of CIN. METHODS AND RESULTS—The ratios of contrast volume-to-creatinine clearance (V/CrCl) and hydration volume to body weight (HV/W) were determined in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Receiver–operator characteristic curve analysis based on the maximum Youden index was used to identify the optimal cutoff for V/CrCl in all patients and in HV/W subgroups. Eighty-six of 3273 (2.6%) patients with mean CrCl 71.89±27.02 mL/min developed CIN. Receiver–operator characteristic curve analysis indicated that a V/CrCl ratio of 2.44 was a fair discriminator for CIN in all patients (sensitivity, 73.3%; specificity, 70.4%). After adjustment for other confounders, V/CrCl >2.44 continued to be significantly associated with CIN (adjusted odds ratio, 4.12; P12 mL/kg; CIN, 5.00%). CONCLUSIONS—The V/CrCl ratio adjusted for HV/W may be a more reliable predictor of CIN and even long-term outcomes after cardiac catheterization. We also found a higher best cutoff value for V/CrCl to predict CIN in patients with a relatively sufficient hydration status, which may be beneficial during decision-making about contrast dose limits in relatively low-risk patients with different hydration statuses.
ISSN:1941-7640
1941-7632
DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001859