Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments
Summary Debonding at the composite‐adhesive interface is a major problem for indirect composite restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of an indirect composite resin after various surface treatments (air‐abrasion with Al2O3, phosphoric acid‐etchig and different ap...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scanning 2015-03, Vol.37 (2), p.89-94 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 94 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 89 |
| container_title | Scanning |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Kirmali, Omer Barutcugil, Cagatay Harorli, Osman Kapdan, Alper Er, Kursat |
| description | Summary
Debonding at the composite‐adhesive interface is a major problem for indirect composite restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of an indirect composite resin after various surface treatments (air‐abrasion with Al2O3, phosphoric acid‐etchig and different applications of NdYAG laser irradiations). Fifty composite disks were subjected to secondary curing to complete polymerization and randomly divided into five experimental groups (n = 10) including Group 1, untreated (control); Group 2, phosphoric acid‐etched; Group 3, air‐abrasion with Al2O3; Group 4, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with non‐contact and Group 5, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with contact. They were then bonded to resin cement and shear BS was determined in a universal testing device at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post‐hoc tests were used to analyze the BS values. The highest BS value was observed in Group 4 and followed by Group 3. Tukey test showed that there was no statistical difference between Group1, 2 and 5. Furthermore, differences in BSs between Group 4 and the other groups except Group 3 were significant (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sca.21183 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685797895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1685797895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5263-7b7febf7758fce84f647de5102c038c5e81a1ac4341d96d486ec9e61db9e632e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EokNhwR9AltiwSevrR-ywq4Z2QKqKVF5Ly3GukcskmdpJH_8ez0zpglVlyb7S-c7VvT6EvAV2BIzx4-zdEQcw4hlZQCN4ZbRUz8mCQQ0Vk0ofkFc5X7HCNgZekgOupDGSsQX5eYk5DtRjj8NEp5HGoYsJ_UT92G_GHCekaYe0Y1GG3x_paQhbfQz0xqU4zpnmOQXnkU4J3bRtlF-TF8GtM755eA_Jj7PT78vP1fnX1ZflyXnlFa9FpVsdsA1aKxM8GhlqqTtUwLhnwniFBhw4L4WErqk7aWr0DdbQteUWHMUh-bDvu0nj9Yx5sn3MHtdrN2CZzEJtlG60adQTUC2Y5pKJgr7_D70a5zSURbYUB84aYQr17oGa2x47u0mxd-ne_vvcAhzvgdu4xvtHHZjdpmZLanaXmv22PNkVxVHtHTFPePfocOmPLdNpZX9drOwnvSpHg70UfwHA5JdX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1672120938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kirmali, Omer ; Barutcugil, Cagatay ; Harorli, Osman ; Kapdan, Alper ; Er, Kursat</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirmali, Omer ; Barutcugil, Cagatay ; Harorli, Osman ; Kapdan, Alper ; Er, Kursat</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Debonding at the composite‐adhesive interface is a major problem for indirect composite restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of an indirect composite resin after various surface treatments (air‐abrasion with Al2O3, phosphoric acid‐etchig and different applications of NdYAG laser irradiations). Fifty composite disks were subjected to secondary curing to complete polymerization and randomly divided into five experimental groups (n = 10) including Group 1, untreated (control); Group 2, phosphoric acid‐etched; Group 3, air‐abrasion with Al2O3; Group 4, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with non‐contact and Group 5, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with contact. They were then bonded to resin cement and shear BS was determined in a universal testing device at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post‐hoc tests were used to analyze the BS values. The highest BS value was observed in Group 4 and followed by Group 3. Tukey test showed that there was no statistical difference between Group1, 2 and 5. Furthermore, differences in BSs between Group 4 and the other groups except Group 3 were significant (p < 0.05) and also there were significant differences in BSs between Group 3 to 1 and Group 3 to 2 (p < 0.05). This study reveals that air‐abrasion with Al2O3 and Nd:YAG laser irradiation with non‐contact provided a significant increase in BS between indirect composite and resin cement. SCANNING 37:89–94, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-0457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-8745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sca.21183</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25488400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aluminum oxide ; Analysis of variance ; Biostatistics ; bond strength ; Cements ; Chemical Phenomena ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Etching - methods ; Humans ; indirect composite resin ; Irradiation ; Lasers ; Nd:YAG laser ; Polymers ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Resins ; Scanning ; SEM ; Surface Properties ; Surface treatment</subject><ispartof>Scanning, 2015-03, Vol.37 (2), p.89-94</ispartof><rights>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5263-7b7febf7758fce84f647de5102c038c5e81a1ac4341d96d486ec9e61db9e632e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25488400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirmali, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barutcugil, Cagatay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harorli, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapdan, Alper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Er, Kursat</creatorcontrib><title>Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments</title><title>Scanning</title><addtitle>Scanning</addtitle><description>Summary
Debonding at the composite‐adhesive interface is a major problem for indirect composite restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of an indirect composite resin after various surface treatments (air‐abrasion with Al2O3, phosphoric acid‐etchig and different applications of NdYAG laser irradiations). Fifty composite disks were subjected to secondary curing to complete polymerization and randomly divided into five experimental groups (n = 10) including Group 1, untreated (control); Group 2, phosphoric acid‐etched; Group 3, air‐abrasion with Al2O3; Group 4, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with non‐contact and Group 5, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with contact. They were then bonded to resin cement and shear BS was determined in a universal testing device at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post‐hoc tests were used to analyze the BS values. The highest BS value was observed in Group 4 and followed by Group 3. Tukey test showed that there was no statistical difference between Group1, 2 and 5. Furthermore, differences in BSs between Group 4 and the other groups except Group 3 were significant (p < 0.05) and also there were significant differences in BSs between Group 3 to 1 and Group 3 to 2 (p < 0.05). This study reveals that air‐abrasion with Al2O3 and Nd:YAG laser irradiation with non‐contact provided a significant increase in BS between indirect composite and resin cement. SCANNING 37:89–94, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Analysis of variance</subject><subject>Biostatistics</subject><subject>bond strength</subject><subject>Cements</subject><subject>Chemical Phenomena</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Etching - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>indirect composite resin</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Nd:YAG laser</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Scanning</subject><subject>SEM</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Surface treatment</subject><issn>0161-0457</issn><issn>1932-8745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EokNhwR9AltiwSevrR-ywq4Z2QKqKVF5Ly3GukcskmdpJH_8ez0zpglVlyb7S-c7VvT6EvAV2BIzx4-zdEQcw4hlZQCN4ZbRUz8mCQQ0Vk0ofkFc5X7HCNgZekgOupDGSsQX5eYk5DtRjj8NEp5HGoYsJ_UT92G_GHCekaYe0Y1GG3x_paQhbfQz0xqU4zpnmOQXnkU4J3bRtlF-TF8GtM755eA_Jj7PT78vP1fnX1ZflyXnlFa9FpVsdsA1aKxM8GhlqqTtUwLhnwniFBhw4L4WErqk7aWr0DdbQteUWHMUh-bDvu0nj9Yx5sn3MHtdrN2CZzEJtlG60adQTUC2Y5pKJgr7_D70a5zSURbYUB84aYQr17oGa2x47u0mxd-ne_vvcAhzvgdu4xvtHHZjdpmZLanaXmv22PNkVxVHtHTFPePfocOmPLdNpZX9drOwnvSpHg70UfwHA5JdX</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Kirmali, Omer</creator><creator>Barutcugil, Cagatay</creator><creator>Harorli, Osman</creator><creator>Kapdan, Alper</creator><creator>Er, Kursat</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments</title><author>Kirmali, Omer ; Barutcugil, Cagatay ; Harorli, Osman ; Kapdan, Alper ; Er, Kursat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5263-7b7febf7758fce84f647de5102c038c5e81a1ac4341d96d486ec9e61db9e632e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Analysis of variance</topic><topic>Biostatistics</topic><topic>bond strength</topic><topic>Cements</topic><topic>Chemical Phenomena</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Etching - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>indirect composite resin</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Nd:YAG laser</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Scanning</topic><topic>SEM</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Surface treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirmali, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barutcugil, Cagatay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harorli, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapdan, Alper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Er, Kursat</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Scanning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirmali, Omer</au><au>Barutcugil, Cagatay</au><au>Harorli, Osman</au><au>Kapdan, Alper</au><au>Er, Kursat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments</atitle><jtitle>Scanning</jtitle><addtitle>Scanning</addtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>89-94</pages><issn>0161-0457</issn><eissn>1932-8745</eissn><abstract>Summary
Debonding at the composite‐adhesive interface is a major problem for indirect composite restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of an indirect composite resin after various surface treatments (air‐abrasion with Al2O3, phosphoric acid‐etchig and different applications of NdYAG laser irradiations). Fifty composite disks were subjected to secondary curing to complete polymerization and randomly divided into five experimental groups (n = 10) including Group 1, untreated (control); Group 2, phosphoric acid‐etched; Group 3, air‐abrasion with Al2O3; Group 4, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with non‐contact and Group 5, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with contact. They were then bonded to resin cement and shear BS was determined in a universal testing device at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post‐hoc tests were used to analyze the BS values. The highest BS value was observed in Group 4 and followed by Group 3. Tukey test showed that there was no statistical difference between Group1, 2 and 5. Furthermore, differences in BSs between Group 4 and the other groups except Group 3 were significant (p < 0.05) and also there were significant differences in BSs between Group 3 to 1 and Group 3 to 2 (p < 0.05). This study reveals that air‐abrasion with Al2O3 and Nd:YAG laser irradiation with non‐contact provided a significant increase in BS between indirect composite and resin cement. SCANNING 37:89–94, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25488400</pmid><doi>10.1002/sca.21183</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0161-0457 |
| ispartof | Scanning, 2015-03, Vol.37 (2), p.89-94 |
| issn | 0161-0457 1932-8745 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685797895 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Aluminum oxide Analysis of variance Biostatistics bond strength Cements Chemical Phenomena Composite Resins - chemistry Dental Etching - methods Humans indirect composite resin Irradiation Lasers Nd:YAG laser Polymers Resin Cements - chemistry Resins Scanning SEM Surface Properties Surface treatment |
| title | Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T12%3A08%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resin%20cement%20to%20indirect%20composite%20resin%20bonding:%20Effect%20of%20various%20surface%20treatments&rft.jtitle=Scanning&rft.au=Kirmali,%20Omer&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=89-94&rft.issn=0161-0457&rft.eissn=1932-8745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sca.21183&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1685797895%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1672120938&rft_id=info:pmid/25488400&rfr_iscdi=true |