Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments

Summary Debonding at the composite‐adhesive interface is a major problem for indirect composite restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of an indirect composite resin after various surface treatments (air‐abrasion with Al2O3, phosphoric acid‐etchig and different ap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scanning 2015-03, Vol.37 (2), p.89-94
Hauptverfasser: Kirmali, Omer, Barutcugil, Cagatay, Harorli, Osman, Kapdan, Alper, Er, Kursat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Debonding at the composite‐adhesive interface is a major problem for indirect composite restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of an indirect composite resin after various surface treatments (air‐abrasion with Al2O3, phosphoric acid‐etchig and different applications of NdYAG laser irradiations). Fifty composite disks were subjected to secondary curing to complete polymerization and randomly divided into five experimental groups (n = 10) including Group 1, untreated (control); Group 2, phosphoric acid‐etched; Group 3, air‐abrasion with Al2O3; Group 4, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with non‐contact and Group 5, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with contact. They were then bonded to resin cement and shear BS was determined in a universal testing device at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post‐hoc tests were used to analyze the BS values. The highest BS value was observed in Group 4 and followed by Group 3. Tukey test showed that there was no statistical difference between Group1, 2 and 5. Furthermore, differences in BSs between Group 4 and the other groups except Group 3 were significant (p 
ISSN:0161-0457
1932-8745
DOI:10.1002/sca.21183