Synthesis of metronidazole-imprinted molecularly imprinted polymers by distillation precipitation polymerization and their use as a solid-phase adsorbent and chromatographic filler
Metronidazole‐imprinted polymers with superior recognition properties were prepared by a novel strategy called distillation–precipitation polymerization. The as‐obtained polymers were characterized by Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, laser particle size determination and scanning electron mi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of separation science 2015-04, Vol.38 (7), p.1172-1178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Metronidazole‐imprinted polymers with superior recognition properties were prepared by a novel strategy called distillation–precipitation polymerization. The as‐obtained polymers were characterized by Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, laser particle size determination and scanning electron microscopy, and their binding performances were evaluated in detail by static, kinetic and dynamic rebinding tests, and Scatchard analysis. The results showed that when the fraction of the monomers was 5 vol% in the whole reaction system, the prepared polymers afforded good morphology, monodispersity, and high adsorption capacity and excellent selectivity to the target molecule, metronidazole. The optimal binding performance is 12.41 mg/g for metronidazole just before leakage occurred and 38.51 mg/g at saturation in dynamic rebinding tests. Metronidazole‐imprinted polymers were further applied as packing agents in solid‐phase extraction and as chromatographic filler, both of which served for the detection of metronidazole in fish tissue. The results illustrated the recoveries of spiked samples ranged from 82.97 to 87.83% by using molecularly imprinted solid‐phase extraction combined with a C18 commercial column and 93.7 to 101.2% by directly using the polymer‐packed chromatographic column. The relative standard deviation of both methods was less than 6%. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1615-9306 1615-9314 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jssc.201401248 |