Potential association of bystander–patient relationship with bystander response and patient survival in daytime out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Abstract Aim To investigate whether the bystander–patient relationship affects bystander response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and patient outcomes depending on the time of day. Methods This population-based observational study in Japan involving 139,265 bystander-witnessed OHCAs (90,426...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Resuscitation 2015-01, Vol.86, p.74-81
Hauptverfasser: Tanaka, Yoshio, Maeda, Tetsuo, Kamikura, Takahisa, Nishi, Taiki, Omi, Wataru, Hashimoto, Masaaki, Sakagami, Satoru, Inaba, Hideo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aim To investigate whether the bystander–patient relationship affects bystander response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and patient outcomes depending on the time of day. Methods This population-based observational study in Japan involving 139,265 bystander-witnessed OHCAs (90,426 family members, 10,479 friends/colleagues, and 38,360 others) without prehospital physician involvement was conducted from 2005 to 2009. Factors associated with better bystander response [early emergency call and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR)] and 1-month neurologically favourable survival were assessed. Results The rates of dispatcher-assisted CPR during daytime (7:00–18:59) and nighttime (19:00–6:59) were highest in family members (45.6% and 46.1%, respectively, for family members; 28.7% and 29.2%, respectively, for friends/colleagues; and 28.1% and 25.3%, respectively, for others). However, the BCPR rates were lowest in family members (35.5% and 37.8%, respectively, for family members; 43.7% and 37.8%, respectively, for friends/colleagues; and 59.3% and 50.0%, respectively, for others). Large delays (≥5 min) in placing emergency calls and initiating BCPR were most frequent in family members. The overall survival rate was lowest (2.7%) for family members and highest (9.1%) for friends/colleagues during daytime. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the effect of bystander relationship on survival was significant only during daytime [adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for survival from daytime OHCAs with family as reference were 1.51 (1.36–1.68) for friends/colleagues and 1.23 (1.13–1.34) for others]. Conclusions Family members are least likely to perform BCPR and OHCAs witnessed by family members are least likely to survive during daytime. Different strategies are required for family-witnessed OHCAs.
ISSN:0300-9572
1873-1570
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.004