Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study

To assess the effect of radiation dose reduction on low-contrast detectability by using an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) algorithm in a contrast-detail phantom with a third-generation dual-source multidetector computed tomography (CT) scan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2015-06, Vol.275 (3), p.735-745
Hauptverfasser: Solomon, Justin, Mileto, Achille, Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos, Samei, Ehsan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 745
container_issue 3
container_start_page 735
container_title Radiology
container_volume 275
creator Solomon, Justin
Mileto, Achille
Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos
Samei, Ehsan
description To assess the effect of radiation dose reduction on low-contrast detectability by using an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) algorithm in a contrast-detail phantom with a third-generation dual-source multidetector computed tomography (CT) scanner. A proprietary phantom with a range of low-contrast cylindrical objects, representing five contrast levels (range, 5-20 HU) and three sizes (range, 2-6 mm) was fabricated with a three-dimensional printer and imaged with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner at various radiation dose index levels (range, 0.74-5.8 mGy). Image data sets were reconstructed by using different section thicknesses (range, 0.6-5.0 mm) and reconstruction algorithms (filtered back projection [FBP] and ADMIRE with a strength range of three to five). Eleven independent readers blinded to technique and reconstruction method assessed all data sets in two reading sessions by measuring detection accuracy with a two-alternative forced choice approach (first session) and by scoring the total number of visible object groups (second session). Dose reduction potentials based on both reading sessions were estimated. Results between FBP and ADMIRE were compared by using both paired t tests and analysis of variance tests at the 95% significance level. During the first session, detection accuracy increased with increasing contrast, size, and dose index (diagnostic accuracy range, 50%-87%; interobserver variability, ±7%). When compared with FBP, ADMIRE improved detection accuracy by 5.2% on average across the investigated variables (P < .001). During the second session, a significantly increased number of visible objects was noted with increasing radiation dose index, section thickness, and ADMIRE strength over FBP (up to 80% more visible objects, P < .001). Radiation dose reduction potential ranged from 56% to 60% and from 4% to 80% during the two sessions, respectively. Low-contrast detectability performance increased with increasing object size, object contrast, dose index, section thickness, and ADMIRE strength. Compared with FBP, ADMIRE allows a substantial radiation dose reduction while preserving low-contrast detectability. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/radiol.15142005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1682892025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1682892025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7c1f26cb91080a9a41e4857c8e4cd826db319bb91f266780bd582c826b146de43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1v3CAQhlHVKtmmOfdWcezFCWBj496i3XxJGzXKbs8WhnFChSEFnGh_c_5E2Y_kNELzzDODXoS-U3JGaSXOg9TG2zPKacUI4Z_QjHLWFLSk_DOaEVKWhahoe4y-xviXEFpx0RyhY8YbThkTM_S2MPLR-ZiMwvcQBh9G6RRgP2Dp8IV-2b40vvMabK63CYJM5gXwAyjvYgqTSsZn0j76YNLTiLMCL_1rMfcuBRkTXkAClWRvrEkb_JohLPH6yQRdXIPb-bJgMUlbrPwU8vK7ySajd2NZNl_jlZIuk7_wvU_gkpF2t-Yh__4w7eP2JH24xri8YmcJIDUEvEqT3nxDXwZpI5we6gn6c3W5nt8Uy9_Xt_OLZaHKUqSiUXRgtepbSgSRrawoVII3SkCltGC17kva9rmdqboRpNdcMJUbPa1qDVV5gn7uvc_B_5sgpm40UYG10oGfYkdrwUTLCOMZPd-jKvgYAwzdczCjDJuOkm6bcLdPuHtPOE_8OMinfgT9wb9HWv4HdtWoLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1682892025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Solomon, Justin ; Mileto, Achille ; Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos ; Samei, Ehsan</creator><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Justin ; Mileto, Achille ; Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos ; Samei, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the effect of radiation dose reduction on low-contrast detectability by using an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) algorithm in a contrast-detail phantom with a third-generation dual-source multidetector computed tomography (CT) scanner. A proprietary phantom with a range of low-contrast cylindrical objects, representing five contrast levels (range, 5-20 HU) and three sizes (range, 2-6 mm) was fabricated with a three-dimensional printer and imaged with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner at various radiation dose index levels (range, 0.74-5.8 mGy). Image data sets were reconstructed by using different section thicknesses (range, 0.6-5.0 mm) and reconstruction algorithms (filtered back projection [FBP] and ADMIRE with a strength range of three to five). Eleven independent readers blinded to technique and reconstruction method assessed all data sets in two reading sessions by measuring detection accuracy with a two-alternative forced choice approach (first session) and by scoring the total number of visible object groups (second session). Dose reduction potentials based on both reading sessions were estimated. Results between FBP and ADMIRE were compared by using both paired t tests and analysis of variance tests at the 95% significance level. During the first session, detection accuracy increased with increasing contrast, size, and dose index (diagnostic accuracy range, 50%-87%; interobserver variability, ±7%). When compared with FBP, ADMIRE improved detection accuracy by 5.2% on average across the investigated variables (P &lt; .001). During the second session, a significantly increased number of visible objects was noted with increasing radiation dose index, section thickness, and ADMIRE strength over FBP (up to 80% more visible objects, P &lt; .001). Radiation dose reduction potential ranged from 56% to 60% and from 4% to 80% during the two sessions, respectively. Low-contrast detectability performance increased with increasing object size, object contrast, dose index, section thickness, and ADMIRE strength. Compared with FBP, ADMIRE allows a substantial radiation dose reduction while preserving low-contrast detectability. Online supplemental material is available for this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.15142005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25751228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Contrast Media ; Equipment Design ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Models, Theoretical ; Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2015-06, Vol.275 (3), p.735-745</ispartof><rights>RSNA, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7c1f26cb91080a9a41e4857c8e4cd826db319bb91f266780bd582c826b146de43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7c1f26cb91080a9a41e4857c8e4cd826db319bb91f266780bd582c826b146de43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25751228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mileto, Achille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samei, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>To assess the effect of radiation dose reduction on low-contrast detectability by using an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) algorithm in a contrast-detail phantom with a third-generation dual-source multidetector computed tomography (CT) scanner. A proprietary phantom with a range of low-contrast cylindrical objects, representing five contrast levels (range, 5-20 HU) and three sizes (range, 2-6 mm) was fabricated with a three-dimensional printer and imaged with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner at various radiation dose index levels (range, 0.74-5.8 mGy). Image data sets were reconstructed by using different section thicknesses (range, 0.6-5.0 mm) and reconstruction algorithms (filtered back projection [FBP] and ADMIRE with a strength range of three to five). Eleven independent readers blinded to technique and reconstruction method assessed all data sets in two reading sessions by measuring detection accuracy with a two-alternative forced choice approach (first session) and by scoring the total number of visible object groups (second session). Dose reduction potentials based on both reading sessions were estimated. Results between FBP and ADMIRE were compared by using both paired t tests and analysis of variance tests at the 95% significance level. During the first session, detection accuracy increased with increasing contrast, size, and dose index (diagnostic accuracy range, 50%-87%; interobserver variability, ±7%). When compared with FBP, ADMIRE improved detection accuracy by 5.2% on average across the investigated variables (P &lt; .001). During the second session, a significantly increased number of visible objects was noted with increasing radiation dose index, section thickness, and ADMIRE strength over FBP (up to 80% more visible objects, P &lt; .001). Radiation dose reduction potential ranged from 56% to 60% and from 4% to 80% during the two sessions, respectively. Low-contrast detectability performance increased with increasing object size, object contrast, dose index, section thickness, and ADMIRE strength. Compared with FBP, ADMIRE allows a substantial radiation dose reduction while preserving low-contrast detectability. Online supplemental material is available for this article.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1v3CAQhlHVKtmmOfdWcezFCWBj496i3XxJGzXKbs8WhnFChSEFnGh_c_5E2Y_kNELzzDODXoS-U3JGaSXOg9TG2zPKacUI4Z_QjHLWFLSk_DOaEVKWhahoe4y-xviXEFpx0RyhY8YbThkTM_S2MPLR-ZiMwvcQBh9G6RRgP2Dp8IV-2b40vvMabK63CYJM5gXwAyjvYgqTSsZn0j76YNLTiLMCL_1rMfcuBRkTXkAClWRvrEkb_JohLPH6yQRdXIPb-bJgMUlbrPwU8vK7ySajd2NZNl_jlZIuk7_wvU_gkpF2t-Yh__4w7eP2JH24xri8YmcJIDUEvEqT3nxDXwZpI5we6gn6c3W5nt8Uy9_Xt_OLZaHKUqSiUXRgtepbSgSRrawoVII3SkCltGC17kva9rmdqboRpNdcMJUbPa1qDVV5gn7uvc_B_5sgpm40UYG10oGfYkdrwUTLCOMZPd-jKvgYAwzdczCjDJuOkm6bcLdPuHtPOE_8OMinfgT9wb9HWv4HdtWoLg</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Solomon, Justin</creator><creator>Mileto, Achille</creator><creator>Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Samei, Ehsan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study</title><author>Solomon, Justin ; Mileto, Achille ; Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos ; Samei, Ehsan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7c1f26cb91080a9a41e4857c8e4cd826db319bb91f266780bd582c826b146de43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mileto, Achille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samei, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solomon, Justin</au><au>Mileto, Achille</au><au>Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos</au><au>Samei, Ehsan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>275</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>735</spage><epage>745</epage><pages>735-745</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>To assess the effect of radiation dose reduction on low-contrast detectability by using an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) algorithm in a contrast-detail phantom with a third-generation dual-source multidetector computed tomography (CT) scanner. A proprietary phantom with a range of low-contrast cylindrical objects, representing five contrast levels (range, 5-20 HU) and three sizes (range, 2-6 mm) was fabricated with a three-dimensional printer and imaged with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner at various radiation dose index levels (range, 0.74-5.8 mGy). Image data sets were reconstructed by using different section thicknesses (range, 0.6-5.0 mm) and reconstruction algorithms (filtered back projection [FBP] and ADMIRE with a strength range of three to five). Eleven independent readers blinded to technique and reconstruction method assessed all data sets in two reading sessions by measuring detection accuracy with a two-alternative forced choice approach (first session) and by scoring the total number of visible object groups (second session). Dose reduction potentials based on both reading sessions were estimated. Results between FBP and ADMIRE were compared by using both paired t tests and analysis of variance tests at the 95% significance level. During the first session, detection accuracy increased with increasing contrast, size, and dose index (diagnostic accuracy range, 50%-87%; interobserver variability, ±7%). When compared with FBP, ADMIRE improved detection accuracy by 5.2% on average across the investigated variables (P &lt; .001). During the second session, a significantly increased number of visible objects was noted with increasing radiation dose index, section thickness, and ADMIRE strength over FBP (up to 80% more visible objects, P &lt; .001). Radiation dose reduction potential ranged from 56% to 60% and from 4% to 80% during the two sessions, respectively. Low-contrast detectability performance increased with increasing object size, object contrast, dose index, section thickness, and ADMIRE strength. Compared with FBP, ADMIRE allows a substantial radiation dose reduction while preserving low-contrast detectability. Online supplemental material is available for this article.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25751228</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.15142005</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8419
ispartof Radiology, 2015-06, Vol.275 (3), p.735-745
issn 0033-8419
1527-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1682892025
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Algorithms
Contrast Media
Equipment Design
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Models, Theoretical
Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation Dosage
title Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A35%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Performance%20of%20an%20Advanced%20Modeled%20Iterative%20Reconstruction%20Algorithm%20for%20Low-Contrast%20Detectability%20with%20a%20Third-Generation%20Dual-Source%20Multidetector%20CT%20Scanner:%20Potential%20for%20Radiation%20Dose%20Reduction%20in%20a%20Multireader%20Study&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Solomon,%20Justin&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=275&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=735&rft.epage=745&rft.pages=735-745&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.15142005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1682892025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1682892025&rft_id=info:pmid/25751228&rfr_iscdi=true