Peri-operative management in urinary diversion surgery: A time for change?

Abstract Introduction Bowel preparation was established as part of the pre-operative course for patients undergoing ileal conduit formation since the late 1970's. Rationales for its use include reduction in infection and wound complications, technically easier anastomosis and earlier return to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The surgeon (Edinburgh) 2015-06, Vol.13 (3), p.127-131
Hauptverfasser: Kelly, M.E, McGuire, B.B, Nason, G.J, Lennon, G.M, Mulvin, D.W, Galvin, D.J, Quinlan, D.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Bowel preparation was established as part of the pre-operative course for patients undergoing ileal conduit formation since the late 1970's. Rationales for its use include reduction in infection and wound complications, technically easier anastomosis and earlier return to bowel function. However, recent reports have challenged this practice. Traditionally antibiotics were also administered for several days prior to surgery with the assumption that bacterial load was reduced. Modification of antibiotic protocols resulted from evidence-based findings. Furthermore, publications emphasizing the benefit of Enhanced Recovery Protocols/Programmes (ERP) have become contemporary. Methods An online multiple-choice questionnaire (via Monkey Survey® ) was administered to all consultant urologists in Ireland. This national cross-sectional study evaluated the use of bowel preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis prior to urinary diversion. In addition, we also assessed consultant urologists' awareness of ERP and their views on the introduction and implementation of such a national program. Results Of the 41 consultant urologists surveyed, 80.4% ( n  = 33) responded. 63.6% routinely used bowel preparation. Klean Prep® was the most commonly used bowel preparation. 80.9% of urologists admit their patient's one-day pre-operatively for bowel preparation, with 87.8% using antibiotic prophylaxis at anesthesia induction, and 18.1% continuing the antibiotics for 24–48 h post-operatively. Although 74% of consultants are aware of ERP, only 66.6% are in favor of their national implementation. Conclusion The majority of Irish urologists use bowel preparation prior to ileal conduit formation. Substantial recent evidence has emerged showing no difference in infective complications or anastomotic leakage when bowel preparation was not used. National guidelines would be beneficial regarding the use of bowel preparation, antibiotic prophylaxis and ERP for urinary diversion surgery.
ISSN:1479-666X
DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2013.09.010