Protecting environmental audits and reports: Balancing self-examination and self-protection

Recently, some companies have begun making environmental reports and internal audits public. Other companies have chosen not to do so. The desire to engage in a critical and thorough self‐examination is often thwarted by the fear that audits and other reports may be used against a company in later l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remediation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1995-03, Vol.5 (2), p.21-28
1. Verfasser: Erickson, Randall L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recently, some companies have begun making environmental reports and internal audits public. Other companies have chosen not to do so. The desire to engage in a critical and thorough self‐examination is often thwarted by the fear that audits and other reports may be used against a company in later litigation or administrative proceedings. However, there are some legal, regulatory, and procedural safeguards that can protect a company that chooses to make reports and audits public. This article examines these safeguards, their strengths and weaknesses, and their role in balancing self‐examination and self‐protection.
ISSN:1051-5658
1520-6831
DOI:10.1002/rem.3440050205