Protecting environmental audits and reports: Balancing self-examination and self-protection
Recently, some companies have begun making environmental reports and internal audits public. Other companies have chosen not to do so. The desire to engage in a critical and thorough self‐examination is often thwarted by the fear that audits and other reports may be used against a company in later l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Remediation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1995-03, Vol.5 (2), p.21-28 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recently, some companies have begun making environmental reports and internal audits public. Other companies have chosen not to do so. The desire to engage in a critical and thorough self‐examination is often thwarted by the fear that audits and other reports may be used against a company in later litigation or administrative proceedings. However, there are some legal, regulatory, and procedural safeguards that can protect a company that chooses to make reports and audits public. This article examines these safeguards, their strengths and weaknesses, and their role in balancing self‐examination and self‐protection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1051-5658 1520-6831 |
DOI: | 10.1002/rem.3440050205 |