Measuring Vital Signs: An IOM Report on Core Metrics for Health and Health Care Progress

Two truisms apply to the current state of performance measurement in health care. The first is that if something (eg, a process, an outcome) cannot be measured, it cannot be improved. The second is that it is possible to have too much of a good thing. The recent enactment of HR 2: Medicare Access an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2015-05, Vol.313 (19), p.1901-1902
Hauptverfasser: Blumenthal, David, McGinnis, J. Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two truisms apply to the current state of performance measurement in health care. The first is that if something (eg, a process, an outcome) cannot be measured, it cannot be improved. The second is that it is possible to have too much of a good thing. The recent enactment of HR 2: Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, the so-called Doc Fix legislation, confirms the broadening societal embrace of the first truism. The new law makes plain that public policy makers are intent on measuring the value of health care services and rewarding clinicians and health care entities that improve that value. Private payers are also shifting rapidly to pay-for-performance models, as illustrated by the work of Catalyst for Payment Reform to develop scorecards, databases, and other value-driven tools on behalf of employers and other health care purchasers. Here, Blumenthal and McGinnis discuss an Institute of Medicine report that identifies 15 measures as core metrics for better health at lower cost.
ISSN:0098-7484
1538-3598
DOI:10.1001/jama.2015.4862