Bone marrow stimulation at the footprint of arthroscopic surface-holding repair advances cuff repair integrity

Background Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) at the footprint of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has not been fully evaluated according to the preoperative tear size and surgical technique. In this study, we investigated the effect of BMS on cuff repair integrity after an arthroscopic surface-holding (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2015-06, Vol.24 (6), p.860-866
Hauptverfasser: Taniguchi, Noboru, MD, PhD, Suenaga, Naoki, MD, PhD, Oizumi, Naomi, MD, PhD, Miyoshi, Naoki, MD, Yamaguchi, Hiroshi, MD, Inoue, Kazuya, MD, Chosa, Etsuo, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) at the footprint of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has not been fully evaluated according to the preoperative tear size and surgical technique. In this study, we investigated the effect of BMS on cuff repair integrity after an arthroscopic surface-holding (ASH) repair. Materials and methods A total of 111 patients (mean age, 64.5 years) with chronic rotator cuff tears who underwent treatment by the ASH method with BMS by drilling of multiple holes at the footprint (67 shoulders) or without BMS (44 shoulders) were studied, and all patients were observed prospectively. Sugaya's classification was used to evaluate cuff integrity by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, with types IV and V classified as rotator cuff retears. Results The mean scores for cuff integrity were 2.2 ± 0.2 and 1.7 ± 0.2 in the non-BMS and BMS groups, respectively. The mean scores were similar between the 2 groups for medium tears; however, scores for large-massive tears were significantly lower in the BMS group. The overall retear rate was 23.9% in the non-BMS group and 9.1% in the BMS group, and the distribution of repair types differed significantly. For large-massive tears, the retear rate was much higher in the non-BMS group (28.6%) than in the BMS group (4.5%), although the rates for medium tears were comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that applying BMS to the footprint during ASH repair results in improved cuff repair integrity, particularly in large-massive tears, and suggest the importance of biologic treatment for rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
ISSN:1058-2746
1532-6500
DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.031