Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study

Purpose To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability. Methods Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2015-05, Vol.73 (5), p.1988-1998
Hauptverfasser: Jambor, Ivan, Merisaari, Harri, Taimen, Pekka, Boström, Peter, Minn, Heikki, Pesola, Marko, Aronen, Hannu J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1998
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1988
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 73
creator Jambor, Ivan
Merisaari, Harri
Taimen, Pekka
Boström, Peter
Minn, Heikki
Pesola, Marko
Aronen, Hannu J.
description Purpose To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability. Methods Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b‐values, respectively. The highest b‐value was 2000 s/mm2. The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F‐ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1). Results The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values. Conclusion Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2. Magn Reson Med 73:1988–1998, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.25323
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680452905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680452905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-6b62145de44a6959d84f04e92443bdd0ffdc8e00fd4a78eed8a46238c72ba81e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EosOUBS-ALLFhk9Z27MRhV6p2QJpSqeplaTnx8YxLLlPbocy78LB4MqVIrNj4In_f8bF_hN5RckQJYced746YyFn-As2oYCxjouIv0YyUnGQ5rfgBehPCPSGkqkr-Gh0wQXjBJZuhX2c_dDvq6IYeDxYbZy146CPudFxDGlyjW9wNBtqA7eAnYgwJzx7BrdYRDHadXrl-tfP7wXeJ3_ghRB0B69783TS6b8DjZCd4nWRcZ7vbIXzCJ9jDBnTUtWtd3OIQR7M9RK-sbgO8fZrn6Ob87Pr0S7a8XHw9PVlmjShonhV1wSgXBjjXRSUqI7klHCrGeV4bQ6w1jQRCrOG6lABGal6wXDYlq7WkkM_Rx33d1OpDaieqzoUG2lb3MIxB0UISLlhFxH-gJa8KIif0wz_o_TD6Pj1koqjgZYpsjt4_UWPdgVEbn77Tb9WfiBJwvAceXQvb53NK1C57lbJXU_bq4upiWiQj2xsuRPj5bGj_XRVlXgp1922hPt9eX53fLRdK5r8BSkmygQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674154732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><creator>Jambor, Ivan ; Merisaari, Harri ; Taimen, Pekka ; Boström, Peter ; Minn, Heikki ; Pesola, Marko ; Aronen, Hannu J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jambor, Ivan ; Merisaari, Harri ; Taimen, Pekka ; Boström, Peter ; Minn, Heikki ; Pesola, Marko ; Aronen, Hannu J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability. Methods Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b‐values, respectively. The highest b‐value was 2000 s/mm2. The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F‐ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1). Results The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values. Conclusion Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2. Magn Reson Med 73:1988–1998, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25323</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25046482</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MRMEEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Akaike information criteria ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; diffusion-weighted imaging ; Echo-Planar Imaging - methods ; Humans ; intraclass correlation coefficient ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; normal prostate ; prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reference Values ; repeatability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2015-05, Vol.73 (5), p.1988-1998</ispartof><rights>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-6b62145de44a6959d84f04e92443bdd0ffdc8e00fd4a78eed8a46238c72ba81e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.25323$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.25323$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25046482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jambor, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merisaari, Harri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taimen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boström, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minn, Heikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesola, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronen, Hannu J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability. Methods Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b‐values, respectively. The highest b‐value was 2000 s/mm2. The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F‐ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1). Results The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values. Conclusion Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2. Magn Reson Med 73:1988–1998, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Akaike information criteria</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>diffusion-weighted imaging</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraclass correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>normal prostate</subject><subject>prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>repeatability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EosOUBS-ALLFhk9Z27MRhV6p2QJpSqeplaTnx8YxLLlPbocy78LB4MqVIrNj4In_f8bF_hN5RckQJYced746YyFn-As2oYCxjouIv0YyUnGQ5rfgBehPCPSGkqkr-Gh0wQXjBJZuhX2c_dDvq6IYeDxYbZy146CPudFxDGlyjW9wNBtqA7eAnYgwJzx7BrdYRDHadXrl-tfP7wXeJ3_ghRB0B69783TS6b8DjZCd4nWRcZ7vbIXzCJ9jDBnTUtWtd3OIQR7M9RK-sbgO8fZrn6Ob87Pr0S7a8XHw9PVlmjShonhV1wSgXBjjXRSUqI7klHCrGeV4bQ6w1jQRCrOG6lABGal6wXDYlq7WkkM_Rx33d1OpDaieqzoUG2lb3MIxB0UISLlhFxH-gJa8KIif0wz_o_TD6Pj1koqjgZYpsjt4_UWPdgVEbn77Tb9WfiBJwvAceXQvb53NK1C57lbJXU_bq4upiWiQj2xsuRPj5bGj_XRVlXgp1922hPt9eX53fLRdK5r8BSkmygQ</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Jambor, Ivan</creator><creator>Merisaari, Harri</creator><creator>Taimen, Pekka</creator><creator>Boström, Peter</creator><creator>Minn, Heikki</creator><creator>Pesola, Marko</creator><creator>Aronen, Hannu J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study</title><author>Jambor, Ivan ; Merisaari, Harri ; Taimen, Pekka ; Boström, Peter ; Minn, Heikki ; Pesola, Marko ; Aronen, Hannu J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-6b62145de44a6959d84f04e92443bdd0ffdc8e00fd4a78eed8a46238c72ba81e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Akaike information criteria</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>diffusion-weighted imaging</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraclass correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>normal prostate</topic><topic>prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>repeatability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jambor, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merisaari, Harri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taimen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boström, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minn, Heikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesola, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronen, Hannu J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jambor, Ivan</au><au>Merisaari, Harri</au><au>Taimen, Pekka</au><au>Boström, Peter</au><au>Minn, Heikki</au><au>Pesola, Marko</au><au>Aronen, Hannu J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1988</spage><epage>1998</epage><pages>1988-1998</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><coden>MRMEEN</coden><abstract>Purpose To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability. Methods Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b‐values, respectively. The highest b‐value was 2000 s/mm2. The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F‐ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1). Results The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values. Conclusion Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2. Magn Reson Med 73:1988–1998, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25046482</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.25323</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2015-05, Vol.73 (5), p.1988-1998
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680452905
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content
subjects Aged
Akaike information criteria
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
diffusion-weighted imaging
Echo-Planar Imaging - methods
Humans
intraclass correlation coefficient
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
normal prostate
prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Reference Values
repeatability
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A17%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20different%20mathematical%20models%20for%20diffusion-weighted%20imaging%20of%20normal%20prostate%20and%20prostate%20cancer%20using%20high%20b-values:%20A%20repeatability%20study&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Jambor,%20Ivan&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1988&rft.epage=1998&rft.pages=1988-1998&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft.coden=MRMEEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.25323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1680452905%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674154732&rft_id=info:pmid/25046482&rfr_iscdi=true