Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study
Purpose To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability. Methods Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PC...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2015-05, Vol.73 (5), p.1988-1998 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1998 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1988 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Jambor, Ivan Merisaari, Harri Taimen, Pekka Boström, Peter Minn, Heikki Pesola, Marko Aronen, Hannu J. |
description | Purpose
To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability.
Methods
Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b‐values, respectively. The highest b‐value was 2000 s/mm2. The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F‐ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1).
Results
The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values.
Conclusion
Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2. Magn Reson Med 73:1988–1998, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.25323 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680452905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680452905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-6b62145de44a6959d84f04e92443bdd0ffdc8e00fd4a78eed8a46238c72ba81e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EosOUBS-ALLFhk9Z27MRhV6p2QJpSqeplaTnx8YxLLlPbocy78LB4MqVIrNj4In_f8bF_hN5RckQJYced746YyFn-As2oYCxjouIv0YyUnGQ5rfgBehPCPSGkqkr-Gh0wQXjBJZuhX2c_dDvq6IYeDxYbZy146CPudFxDGlyjW9wNBtqA7eAnYgwJzx7BrdYRDHadXrl-tfP7wXeJ3_ghRB0B69783TS6b8DjZCd4nWRcZ7vbIXzCJ9jDBnTUtWtd3OIQR7M9RK-sbgO8fZrn6Ob87Pr0S7a8XHw9PVlmjShonhV1wSgXBjjXRSUqI7klHCrGeV4bQ6w1jQRCrOG6lABGal6wXDYlq7WkkM_Rx33d1OpDaieqzoUG2lb3MIxB0UISLlhFxH-gJa8KIif0wz_o_TD6Pj1koqjgZYpsjt4_UWPdgVEbn77Tb9WfiBJwvAceXQvb53NK1C57lbJXU_bq4upiWiQj2xsuRPj5bGj_XRVlXgp1922hPt9eX53fLRdK5r8BSkmygQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674154732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><creator>Jambor, Ivan ; Merisaari, Harri ; Taimen, Pekka ; Boström, Peter ; Minn, Heikki ; Pesola, Marko ; Aronen, Hannu J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jambor, Ivan ; Merisaari, Harri ; Taimen, Pekka ; Boström, Peter ; Minn, Heikki ; Pesola, Marko ; Aronen, Hannu J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability.
Methods
Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b‐values, respectively. The highest b‐value was 2000 s/mm2. The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F‐ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1).
Results
The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values.
Conclusion
Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2. Magn Reson Med 73:1988–1998, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25323</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25046482</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MRMEEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Akaike information criteria ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; diffusion-weighted imaging ; Echo-Planar Imaging - methods ; Humans ; intraclass correlation coefficient ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; normal prostate ; prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reference Values ; repeatability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2015-05, Vol.73 (5), p.1988-1998</ispartof><rights>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-6b62145de44a6959d84f04e92443bdd0ffdc8e00fd4a78eed8a46238c72ba81e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.25323$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.25323$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25046482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jambor, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merisaari, Harri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taimen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boström, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minn, Heikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesola, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronen, Hannu J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>Purpose
To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability.
Methods
Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b‐values, respectively. The highest b‐value was 2000 s/mm2. The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F‐ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1).
Results
The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values.
Conclusion
Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2. Magn Reson Med 73:1988–1998, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Akaike information criteria</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>diffusion-weighted imaging</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraclass correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>normal prostate</subject><subject>prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>repeatability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EosOUBS-ALLFhk9Z27MRhV6p2QJpSqeplaTnx8YxLLlPbocy78LB4MqVIrNj4In_f8bF_hN5RckQJYced746YyFn-As2oYCxjouIv0YyUnGQ5rfgBehPCPSGkqkr-Gh0wQXjBJZuhX2c_dDvq6IYeDxYbZy146CPudFxDGlyjW9wNBtqA7eAnYgwJzx7BrdYRDHadXrl-tfP7wXeJ3_ghRB0B69783TS6b8DjZCd4nWRcZ7vbIXzCJ9jDBnTUtWtd3OIQR7M9RK-sbgO8fZrn6Ob87Pr0S7a8XHw9PVlmjShonhV1wSgXBjjXRSUqI7klHCrGeV4bQ6w1jQRCrOG6lABGal6wXDYlq7WkkM_Rx33d1OpDaieqzoUG2lb3MIxB0UISLlhFxH-gJa8KIif0wz_o_TD6Pj1koqjgZYpsjt4_UWPdgVEbn77Tb9WfiBJwvAceXQvb53NK1C57lbJXU_bq4upiWiQj2xsuRPj5bGj_XRVlXgp1922hPt9eX53fLRdK5r8BSkmygQ</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Jambor, Ivan</creator><creator>Merisaari, Harri</creator><creator>Taimen, Pekka</creator><creator>Boström, Peter</creator><creator>Minn, Heikki</creator><creator>Pesola, Marko</creator><creator>Aronen, Hannu J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study</title><author>Jambor, Ivan ; Merisaari, Harri ; Taimen, Pekka ; Boström, Peter ; Minn, Heikki ; Pesola, Marko ; Aronen, Hannu J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-6b62145de44a6959d84f04e92443bdd0ffdc8e00fd4a78eed8a46238c72ba81e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Akaike information criteria</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>diffusion-weighted imaging</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraclass correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>normal prostate</topic><topic>prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>repeatability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jambor, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merisaari, Harri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taimen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boström, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minn, Heikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesola, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronen, Hannu J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jambor, Ivan</au><au>Merisaari, Harri</au><au>Taimen, Pekka</au><au>Boström, Peter</au><au>Minn, Heikki</au><au>Pesola, Marko</au><au>Aronen, Hannu J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1988</spage><epage>1998</epage><pages>1988-1998</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><coden>MRMEEN</coden><abstract>Purpose
To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2, in terms of fitting quality and repeatability.
Methods
Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b‐values, respectively. The highest b‐value was 2000 s/mm2. The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F‐ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1).
Results
The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values.
Conclusion
Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b‐values up to 2000 s/mm2. Magn Reson Med 73:1988–1998, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25046482</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.25323</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2015-05, Vol.73 (5), p.1988-1998 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680452905 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content |
subjects | Aged Akaike information criteria Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods diffusion-weighted imaging Echo-Planar Imaging - methods Humans intraclass correlation coefficient Male Middle Aged Models, Theoretical normal prostate prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Reference Values repeatability Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A17%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20different%20mathematical%20models%20for%20diffusion-weighted%20imaging%20of%20normal%20prostate%20and%20prostate%20cancer%20using%20high%20b-values:%20A%20repeatability%20study&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Jambor,%20Ivan&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1988&rft.epage=1998&rft.pages=1988-1998&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft.coden=MRMEEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.25323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1680452905%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674154732&rft_id=info:pmid/25046482&rfr_iscdi=true |