Translational value of mouse models in oncology drug development

In this Perspective, Fred De Sauvage and Stephen Gould discuss the suitability of different mouse models for modeling cancer pathogenic processes, with an emphasis on applicability to developing cancer therapies. Much has been written about the advantages and disadvantages of various oncology model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature medicine 2015-05, Vol.21 (5), p.431-439
Hauptverfasser: Gould, Stephen E, Junttila, Melissa R, de Sauvage, Frederic J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this Perspective, Fred De Sauvage and Stephen Gould discuss the suitability of different mouse models for modeling cancer pathogenic processes, with an emphasis on applicability to developing cancer therapies. Much has been written about the advantages and disadvantages of various oncology model systems, with the overall finding that these models lack the predictive power required to translate preclinical efficacy into clinical activity. Despite assertions that some preclinical model systems are superior to others, no single model can suffice to inform preclinical target validation and molecule selection. This perspective provides a balanced albeit critical view of these claims of superiority and outlines a framework for the proper use of existing preclinical models for drug testing and discovery. We also highlight gaps in oncology mouse models and discuss general and pervasive model-independent shortcomings in preclinical oncology work, and we propose ways to address these issues.
ISSN:1078-8956
1546-170X
DOI:10.1038/nm.3853