Optimal Indications for Additional Resection of the Invasive Cancer-Positive Proximal Bile Duct Margin in Cases of Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Background The survival benefits of additional resection of the positive proximal ductal margin in cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma remain to be elucidated. The purpose of this retrospective study was to clarify the optimal indications for additional resection of the invasive cancer-positive pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2015-06, Vol.22 (6), p.1915-1924
Hauptverfasser: Oguro, Seiji, Esaki, Minoru, Kishi, Yoji, Nara, Satoshi, Shimada, Kazuaki, Ojima, Hidenori, Kosuge, Tomoo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The survival benefits of additional resection of the positive proximal ductal margin in cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma remain to be elucidated. The purpose of this retrospective study was to clarify the optimal indications for additional resection of the invasive cancer-positive proximal ductal margin (PM) Methods All patients who underwent hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2000 and 2011 were analyzed. Surgical variables, the status of the PM, prognostic factors, and survival were evaluated. Results A total of 224 patients were enrolled. Additional resection was performed in 52 of 75 positive PMs of invasive cancer, resulting in 43 negative PMs. The survival of patients with a negative PM treated with additional resection ( n  = 43) was significantly worse than that of the patients with a negative PM treated without additional resection ( n  = 149; P  = 0.031) and did not significantly differ from that of the patients with a positive PM ( n  = 32; P  = 0.215). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level (
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-014-4232-2