Spatio-temporal analysis of vegetation variation in the Yellow River Basin
To understand the variation and patterns of vegetation coverage in the Yellow River Basin, as well as to promote regional ecological protection and maintain ecological construction achievements, MOD13Q1 data at a resolution of 250m were used to calculate the annual average normalised difference vege...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological indicators 2015-04, Vol.51, p.117-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To understand the variation and patterns of vegetation coverage in the Yellow River Basin, as well as to promote regional ecological protection and maintain ecological construction achievements, MOD13Q1 data at a resolution of 250m were used to calculate the annual average normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) in a time series from 2000 to 2010. Using a variation coefficient, a Theil–Sen Median trend analysis, the Mann–Kendall test, and the Hurst index method, this study investigated the temporal and spatial variations of vegetation coverage characteristics of the Yellow River Basin. The results showed that (1) the vegetation coverage of the Yellow River appeared to have an overall trend of high in the southeast and west and low in the northwest; (2) the averaged NDVI of the whole basin fluctuated in a range of 0.3 to 0.4 from 2000 to 2010 (from 2000 to 2004 there were larger variations and these have been growing rapidly since 2005); (3) the NDVI was stable, 73.4% of the vegetation-coverage area fluctuated with a low-to-medium amplitude, while 27.6% of the area varied by a large amplitude; (4) the regions with improved vegetation coverage (62.9%) were far greater than the degraded regions (27.7%), while the sustained invariant area accounted for 9.4% of the total vegetation coverage regions; and (5) 86% of the vegetation-covered area was positively sustainable. The areas with sustainable improvement accounted for 53.7% of the total vegetation coverage area; the invariant area accounted for 7.8%. The area with sustainable degradation was 24.5%; the future variation in trends of the residual (14%) could not be determined. Therefore, continuous attention must be given to the variation in trends of vegetation in the sustainably degraded and underdetermined regions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-160X 1872-7034 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.031 |