Evaluating management strategies to enhance biodiversity in conservation developments: Perspectives from developers in Colorado, USA

•Policy tools needed for long-term stewardship of conservation developments.•Landowners’ and developers’ perspectives examined in Colorado.•Proposed conservation practices and an incentive generally supported by respondents.•Proposed funding mechanisms generally opposed by respondents. Conservation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape and urban planning 2015-04, Vol.136, p.87-96
Hauptverfasser: Feinberg, Daniel S., Hostetler, Mark E., Reed, Sarah E., Pienaar, Elizabeth F., Pejchar, Liba
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Policy tools needed for long-term stewardship of conservation developments.•Landowners’ and developers’ perspectives examined in Colorado.•Proposed conservation practices and an incentive generally supported by respondents.•Proposed funding mechanisms generally opposed by respondents. Conservation development (CD) refers to a set of land development techniques aimed at minimizing impacts on natural resources. Typically, homes are clustered and open space is set aside for conservation. The evidence for the effectiveness of CDs in conserving biodiversity is mixed, with some studies attributing these results to a lack of stewardship in conserved areas. The purpose of this research was to ask landowners and developers to evaluate which conservation practices, as part of a policy scenario, would be most acceptable. We surveyed landowners and developers who had created CDs in north-central Colorado; we solicited their attitudes about native wildlife conservation and willingness to adopt four conservation practices, given proposed incentive-based policies. We also conducted semi-structured interviews with respondents to elaborate on their response to these proposed incentives, as well as two potential funding mechanisms for managing the open space for biodiversity (homeowners’ association dues and a property tax). Overall, we found moderate support for the conservation practices, some interest in two types of incentives (a housing density bonus and fast-tracking permits), and opposition to the two proposed funding mechanisms for land stewardship. Our findings suggest that CD developers in Colorado would be willing to adopt conservation practices, and are generally supportive of incentive-based policies, but greater understanding of homeowners’ willingness to pay for conservation features is needed to gain support for a funding mechanism.
ISSN:0169-2046
1872-6062
DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.002