Periprosthetic Knee Infections Treated with Irrigation and Debridement: Outcomes and Preoperative Predictive Factors

Abstract The role of irrigation and debridement (I&D) in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) of the knee remains controversial. Our purpose was to identify the success rate and factors determining outcome of I&D in those patients. Clinical characteristics of 78 patients wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2015-04, Vol.30 (4), p.649-657
Hauptverfasser: Triantafyllopoulos, Georgios K., MD, MSc, Poultsides, Lazaros A., MD, MSc, PhD, Zhang, Wei, MS, PhD, Sculco, Peter K., MD, Ma, Yan, PhD, Sculco, Thomas P., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract The role of irrigation and debridement (I&D) in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) of the knee remains controversial. Our purpose was to identify the success rate and factors determining outcome of I&D in those patients. Clinical characteristics of 78 patients with PJI of the knee treated with I&D were retrospectively reviewed. Implant retention at final follow-up was achieved in 43 patients (55.1%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that duration of symptoms > 5 days and thyroid disease were independent predictors of I&D failure. Patients with methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections had a success rate of 45.5% and significantly lower odds of success compared to patients with negative cultures. In selected patients, I&D is a reasonable option in the context of acute PJI of the knee.
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.026