Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary cutaneous/soft tissue angiosarcoma: Determining tumor behavior prior to surgical resection
Background Given the propensity for hematogenous metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could treat occult metastatic disease early, potentially improving survival and better defining which primary angiosarcomas (AS) benefit from surgical resection. Methods A retrospective comparison was perform...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2015-06, Vol.111 (7), p.829-833 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Given the propensity for hematogenous metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could treat occult metastatic disease early, potentially improving survival and better defining which primary angiosarcomas (AS) benefit from surgical resection.
Methods
A retrospective comparison was performed of 23 patients with resectable, localized cutaneous/soft tissue primary AS treated with surgery alone (S, n = 13) or NAC followed by surgery (NAC‐S, n = 12).
Results
Primary sites included breast/chest (n = 9), head/neck (n = 9), extremity (n = 3), and other (n = 2). 23% S versus 40% NAC‐S had prior radiation (RT). NAC regimens were paclitaxel (n = 6) or gemcitabine/docetaxel (n = 4). Seventy percent were high grade. Distant metastases were found in 17% after NAC. Non‐primary wound closure was required in 54 %S versus 30%NAC‐S (P = 0.4). R0 resections were achieved in 85% S versus 80% NAC‐S (30% had a complete pathologic response). Two‐year local recurrence (LR)‐free, disease‐free, and overall survivals were 67.1, 38.5, and 61.5% for S versus 68.6, 54.9, and 68.6% for NAC‐S (P = 0.52, 0.67, and 0.58). The mean number of surgical resections/patient to maintain local control was 1.8 S versus 1.3 NAC‐S (P = 0.06).
Conclusions
NAC for primary AS was well tolerated. Although there was no statistically significant survival benefit, NAC helped define who would benefit from surgical resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015 111:829–833. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.23891 |