Assessment of toxicological effects of blood microsampling in the vehicle dosed adult rat

•Historically, satellite groups are used for rodent TK profiling.•Vehicle dosed Wistar rats were un-sampled, conventional blood volume, or μ-sampled.•Terminal clinical pathology parameters were within the historical background range.•Statistically significant haematological changes in conventionally...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 2014-04, Vol.68 (3), p.325-331
Hauptverfasser: Powles-Glover, Nicola, Kirk, Sarah, Wilkinson, Catherine, Robinson, Sally, Stewart, Jane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Historically, satellite groups are used for rodent TK profiling.•Vehicle dosed Wistar rats were un-sampled, conventional blood volume, or μ-sampled.•Terminal clinical pathology parameters were within the historical background range.•Statistically significant haematological changes in conventionally sampled rats.•μ-Sampling of adult rats is possible without adverse toxicological consequences. Historically, satellite groups are often used for rodent toxicokinetic profiling because of the haematological consequences of blood sampling. If microsampling is shown to be toxicologically benign, its adoption in rat studies would enable comparison of exposure and toxicity in individual animals (as happens in non-rodent studies) as well as obviating need for satellite groups. Groups of 10 male (200–300g) and female (150–250g) rats aged 10weeks were vehicle dosed and either left unsampled, conventional blood volume sampled (6×200μL) or microsampled (6×32μL) on Days 1 and 14. At termination on Day 15, clinical pathology plus liver and spleen weights and histopathology were obtained. All clinical pathology parameters were within background range. However, compared to unsampled controls, conventional volume sampled rats showed a statistically significant (p
ISSN:0273-2300
1096-0295
DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.001