Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement

Purpose Providing effective analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients remains challenging. Femoral nerve block (FNB) offers targeted pain control; however, its effect on motor function, related fall risk and impact on rehabilitation has been the source of controversy. Adductor canal block...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International orthopaedics 2015-04, Vol.39 (4), p.673-680
Hauptverfasser: Memtsoudis, Stavros G., Yoo, Daniel, Stundner, Ottokar, Danninger, Thomas, Ma, Yan, Poultsides, Lazaros, Kim, David, Chisholm, Mary, Jules-Elysee, Kethy, Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez Della, Sculco, Thomas P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Providing effective analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients remains challenging. Femoral nerve block (FNB) offers targeted pain control; however, its effect on motor function, related fall risk and impact on rehabilitation has been the source of controversy. Adductor canal block (ACB) potentially spares motor fibres of the femoral nerve, but the comparative effect of the two approaches has not yet been well defined due to considerable variability in pain perception. Our study compares both single-shot FNB and ACB, side to side, in the same patients undergoing bilateral TKA. Methods Sixty patients scheduled for bilateral TKA were randomised to receive ultrasound-guided FNB on one leg and ACB on the other, in addition to combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. The primary outcome was comparative postoperative pain in either extremity at six to eight, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary comparative outcomes included motor strength (manually and via dynamometer), physical therapy milestones and patient satisfaction. Results While pain levels were lowest at six to eight hours postoperatively and increased thereafter ( P  
ISSN:0341-2695
1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-014-2527-3