Plant and bacterial mucilages of the maize rhizosphere: Comparison of their soil binding properties and histochemistry in a model system

Mucilages from the root tips of axenically-grown maize and from a bacterium (Cytophaga sp.) isolated from the rhizosheaths of field-grown roots, were immobilized by drying onto nylon blotting membrane. The mucilage plaques remained in place through repeated re wettings and histochemical treatments. Staining of the plaques showed that both mucilages included acidic groups, and 1,2 diols (the latter notably fewer in bacterial mucilage). Bacterial mucilage plaques stained strongly for protein, plant mucilage was unstained. Plaques of both mucilages bound soil particles strongly if soil was applied to wet mucilage and then dried. Bound soil was not lost with re wetting. Dry weight and densitometer measurements showed that bacterial mucilage bound about 10% more soil than the same surface area of root-cap mucilage. Pretreatment of plaques with periodate oxidation eliminated most soil binding by root-cap mucilage but this was completely reversible by reduction with borohydride. Soil binding to bacterial mucilage was unaffected by periodate but much diminished by borohydride pretreatment (partially restored by subsequent oxidation). Neither pretreatment with cationic dyes nor preincubation in pectinase, pectin methylesterase or protease affected subsequent soil binding by the mucilage plaques. Pretreatment of root-cap mucilage plaques with lectins specific for component sugars also did not alter soil binding. It is concluded that mucilages of both plant and bacterial origin can contribute to the adhesion and cohesion of maize rhizosheaths, but each by a different mechanism. Binding by root-cap mucilage depends on 1,2 diol groups of component sugars, that of bacterial mucilage does not, and is likely to be protein mediated.