Accuracy of Capsule Colonoscopy in Detecting Colorectal Polyps in a Screening Population

Background & Aims Capsule colonoscopy is a minimally invasive imaging method. We measured the accuracy of this technology in detecting polyps 6 mm or larger in an average-risk screening population. Methods In a prospective study, asymptomatic subjects (n = 884) underwent capsule colonoscopy foll...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) N.Y. 1943), 2015-05, Vol.148 (5), p.948-957.e2
Hauptverfasser: Rex, Douglas K, Adler, Samuel N, Aisenberg, James, Burch, Wilmot C, Carretero, Cristina, Chowers, Yehuda, Fein, Steven A, Fern, Steven E, Fernandez-Urien Sainz, Ignacio, Fich, Alexander, Gal, Eyal, Horlander, John C, Isaacs, Kim L, Kariv, Revital, Lahat, Adi, Leung, Wai-Keung, Malik, Pramod R, Morgan, Doug, Papageorgiou, Neofytos, Romeo, David P, Shah, Smita S, Waterman, Matti
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background & Aims Capsule colonoscopy is a minimally invasive imaging method. We measured the accuracy of this technology in detecting polyps 6 mm or larger in an average-risk screening population. Methods In a prospective study, asymptomatic subjects (n = 884) underwent capsule colonoscopy followed by conventional colonoscopy (the reference) several weeks later, with an endoscopist blinded to capsule results, at 10 centers in the United States and 6 centers in Israel from June 2011 through April 2012. An unblinded colonoscopy was performed on subjects found to have lesions 6 mm or larger by capsule but not conventional colonoscopy. Results Among the 884 subjects enrolled, 695 (79%) were included in the analysis of capsule performance for all polyps. There were 77 exclusions (9%) for inadequate cleansing and whole-colon capsule transit time fewer than 40 minutes, 45 exclusions (5%) before capsule ingestion, 15 exclusions (2%) after ingestion and before colonoscopy, and 15 exclusions (2%) for site termination. Capsule colonoscopy identified subjects with 1 or more polyps 6 mm or larger with 81% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 77%−84%) and 93% specificity (95% CI, 91%–95%), and polyps 10 mm or larger with 80% sensitivity (95% CI, 74%−86%) and 97% specificity (95% CI, 96%–98%). Capsule colonoscopy identified subjects with 1 or more conventional adenomas 6 mm or larger with 88% sensitivity (95% CI, 82%−93) and 82% specificity (95% CI, 80%–83%), and 10 mm or larger with 92% sensitivity (95% CI, 82%–97%) and 95% specificity (95% CI, 94%–95%). Sessile serrated polyps and hyperplastic polyps accounted for 26% and 37%, respectively, of false-negative findings from capsule analyses. Conclusions In an average-risk screening population, technically adequate capsule colonoscopy identified individuals with 1 or more conventional adenomas 6 mm or larger with 88% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Capsule performance seems adequate for patients who cannot undergo colonoscopy or who had incomplete colonoscopies. Additional studies are needed to improve capsule detection of serrated lesions. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01372878.
ISSN:0016-5085
1528-0012
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.025