Stepwise sequential screening for Down’s syndrome (combined test associated with modified genetic sonography) in pregnant women with low risk for chromosomal disorders
Objective: To assess the sensitivity (Sen) and false positive ratio (FPR) of stepwise sequential screening [1st step: combined test (CT), 2nd step: modified genetic sonography (major malformation and nuchal fold, MGS)] as a screening method for Down’s syndrome (DS) in the general population of pregn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of perinatal medicine 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.647-651 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To assess the sensitivity (Sen) and false positive ratio (FPR) of stepwise sequential screening [1st step: combined test (CT), 2nd step: modified genetic sonography (major malformation and nuchal fold, MGS)] as a screening method for Down’s syndrome (DS) in the general population of pregnant women. Methods: Prospective study. During a 5-year study period (July 2005 to June 2010), 17,911 pregnant women were screened for DS using a stepwise sequential screening method (CT+MGS). We evaluated the Sen and FPR (95% CI) of the two chromosomal disorder screening methods for DS: CT and CT+MGS. Results: Seventeen thousand nine hundred and eleven cases were analysed, including 67 with chromosome abnormalities and 45 with DS. The Sen of CT for DS was 80% (95% CI; 68.3–91.7) (36/45) with a FPR of 4.2% (95% CI; 3.9–4.5) (752/17, 866). The Sen of CT+MSG for DS was 93.3 (95% CI; 85.9–99) (42/45) with a FPR of 4.8% (95% CI; 4.5–5.1) (860/17, 866). Conclusions: MGS coupled with CT increases the Sen of DS diagnosis by 13.3% (95% CI; 2.7–25.9), with an increase in FPR of 0.6% (95% CI; 0.5–0.7). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-5577 1619-3997 |
DOI: | 10.1515/jpm-2012-0110 |