Estimates of the residual nitrogen benefit of groundnut to maize in Northeast Thailand

Four cultivars of groundnut were grown in upland soil in Northeast Thailand to study the residual benefit of the stover to a subsequent maize crop. An N-balance estimate of the total residual N in the maize supplied by the groundnut was made. In addition three independent estimates were made of the residual benefits to maize when the groundnut stover was returned to the land and incorporated. The first estimate (Estimate 1) was an N-balance estimate. A dual labelling approach was used where ¹⁵N-labelled stover was added to unlabelled microplots (Estimate 2) or unlabelled stover was added to ¹⁵N-labelled soil microplots (Estimate 3). The nodulating groundnut cultivars fixed between 59-64% of their nitrogen (as estimated by the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method using non-nodulating groundnut as a non-fixing reference) producing between 100 and 130 kg N ha⁻¹ in their stover. Although the following maize crop suffered from drought stress, maize grain N and dry weights were up to 80% and 65% greater respectively in the plots where the stover was returned as compared with the plots where the stover was removed. These benefits were comparable with applications of 75 kg N ha⁻¹ nitrogen in the form of urea. The total residual N estimates of the contribution of the nodulated groundnut to the maize ranged from 16.4-27.5 kg N ha⁻¹. Estimates of the residual N supplied by the stover and fallen leaves ranged from 11.9-21.3 kg N ha⁻¹ using the N-balance method (Estimate 1), from 6.3-9.6 kg N ha⁻¹ with the labelled stover method (Estimate 2) and from 0-11.4 kg N ha⁻¹ with the labelled soil method. There was closest agreement between the two ¹⁵N based estimates suggesting that 'apparent added nitrogen interactions' in these soils may not be important and that Í balance estimates can overestimate the residual N in crops following legumes, even in very poor soils. This work also indicates the considerable ability of local groundnut cultivars to fix atmospheric nitrogen and the potential benefits from returning and incorporating legume residues to the soil in the upland cropping systems of Northeast Thailand. The applicability of the ¹⁵N methodology used here and possible reasons for the discrepancies between estimates 1, 2 and 3 are discussed.