Compassion and the fundamental attribution error: A reply to Rolfe & Gardner
In this reply to Rolfe & Gardner's critical discussion of my editorial I do two things. First, I describe the theoretical context of the Darley & Batson study. This is the situationist perspective in social psychology, which overlaps with the idea of the cognitive unconscious. Second, I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nurse education today 2015-03, Vol.35 (3), p.474-479 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this reply to Rolfe & Gardner's critical discussion of my editorial I do two things. First, I describe the theoretical context of the Darley & Batson study. This is the situationist perspective in social psychology, which overlaps with the idea of the cognitive unconscious. Second, I defend my account of the Good Samaritan study against Rolfe & Gardner's criticisms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0260-6917 1532-2793 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.013 |