Anaerobic co-digestion of excess brewery yeast in a granular biomass reactor to enhance the production of biomethane

[Display omitted] ► Brewery yeast was used to produce biogas in an upflow granular anaerobic reactor. ► Mixtures up to 1.1v/v% yeast are anaerobically degradable without adverse effects. ► In full-scale operation biogas production increased by 38.5%. ► Up to 16% natural gas were replaced in brewery...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2012-11, Vol.124, p.328-337
Hauptverfasser: Zupančič, Gregor D, Skrjanec, Igor, Logar, Romana Marinšek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] ► Brewery yeast was used to produce biogas in an upflow granular anaerobic reactor. ► Mixtures up to 1.1v/v% yeast are anaerobically degradable without adverse effects. ► In full-scale operation biogas production increased by 38.5%. ► Up to 16% natural gas were replaced in brewery operation. ► Up to 7% in archeal and a 32% dissimilarity in bacterial community were shown. The anaerobic co-digestion of brewery yeast using granular biomass was studied on the lab, pilot and full-scale. The study shows no adverse effects in the co-digestion of yeast and wastewater in concentrations up to 1.1 (v/v)%. In concentrations up to 2.3% the process is manageable; however, not advisable. In concentrations over 2.8% the process exhibits failure due to the overload with suspended solids. An average specific biogas production of 0.560m3kg−1 of volatile solids was achieved. Full-scale operation with 0.7% yeast concentration showed a 38.5% increase in the biogas production and a 26.2% increase in the organic loading rate, which resulted in an increase of the biomethane/natural-gas substitute ratio from 10% to 16%. The influence of the yeast addition on the structure of the microbial biomass showed up to 7% dissimilarity in the archaeal and a 32% dissimilarity in the bacterial biomass community, which did not present any difficulties.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.064