Kinetic analysis of constructed systems for the recovery of contaminated areas by acid mine drainage

Introduction Flowing of the acid mine drainage may contaminate the adjacent water bodies causing substantial changes in the aquatic ecosystem. This aspect is the most relevant problem in the southern of Santa Catarina once the contaminated areas are inserted in the watershed of the Araranguá, Urussa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science and pollution research international 2012-07, Vol.19 (6), p.2107-2114
Hauptverfasser: Mendes, Erlon, Barros, Erilson, Zocche, Jairo José, Alexandre, Nadja Zim, Galatto, Sérgio Luciano, Back, Marcos, Pereira, Jader Lima, Frassetto, Jonathan, Angioletto, Elidio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Flowing of the acid mine drainage may contaminate the adjacent water bodies causing substantial changes in the aquatic ecosystem. This aspect is the most relevant problem in the southern of Santa Catarina once the contaminated areas are inserted in the watershed of the Araranguá, Urussanga, and Tubarão rivers, increasing the need for recovery studies. These areas are between Criciúma, Içara, Urussanga, Siderópolis, Lauro Müller, Orleans, and Alfredo Wagner towns where a conservation unit exist called the Environmental Preservation Area of Baleia Franca. Aiming to compare the kinetics of the ash derived from burning coal and to neutralize acid mine drainage, different neutralizer, limestone, fly, and bottom ash, was mounted on a pilot scale experiment. Discussion The transport parameters showed the same order of infiltration and dispersion: fly ash < bottom ash < limestone. The order of measured alkalinity was: limestone < fly ash < bottom ash, with pH values of 9.34, 12.07, and 12.25, respectively. The limestone kinetics of acidic drainage neutralization was first order with reaction rate constant k  = 0.0963 min −1 , bottom ash was 3/4 with k  = 0.0723 mol 1/4  L −1/4 min −1 , and the fly ash had higher order kinetics, 4/3, with reaction rate constant k  = 27.122 L 1/3 mol −1/3  min −1 . However, by mathematical modeling, it was found that due to a combination of transport and kinetics, only limestone treatment reached a pH above 6 within 5 years, corresponding to the ideal as planned.
ISSN:0944-1344
1614-7499
DOI:10.1007/s11356-011-0710-2