Constraining the neutron–proton effective mass splitting using empirical constraints on the density dependence of nuclear symmetry energy around normal density

According to the Hugenholtz–Van Hove theorem, nuclear symmetry energy Esym(ρ) and its slope L(ρ) at an arbitrary density ρ are determined by the nucleon isovector (symmetry) potential Usym(ρ,k) and its momentum dependence ∂Usym∂k. The latter determines uniquely the neutron–proton effective k-mass sp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics letters. B 2013-11, Vol.727 (1-3), p.276-281
Hauptverfasser: Li, Bao-An, Han, Xiao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:According to the Hugenholtz–Van Hove theorem, nuclear symmetry energy Esym(ρ) and its slope L(ρ) at an arbitrary density ρ are determined by the nucleon isovector (symmetry) potential Usym(ρ,k) and its momentum dependence ∂Usym∂k. The latter determines uniquely the neutron–proton effective k-mass splitting mn−p⁎(ρ,δ)≡(mn⁎−mp⁎)/m in neutron-rich nucleonic matter of isospin asymmetry δ. Using currently available constraints on the Esym(ρ0) and L(ρ0) at normal density ρ0 of nuclear matter from 28 recent analyses of various terrestrial nuclear laboratory experiments and astrophysical observations, we try to infer the corresponding neutron–proton effective k-mass splitting mn−p⁎(ρ0,δ). While the mean values of the mn−p⁎(ρ0,δ) obtained from most of the studies are remarkably consistent with each other and scatter very closely around an empirical value of mn−p⁎(ρ0,δ)=0.27⋅δ, it is currently not possible to scientifically state surely that the mn−p⁎(ρ0,δ) is positive within the present knowledge of the uncertainties. Quantifying, better understanding and then further reducing the uncertainties using modern statistical and computational techniques in extracting the Esym(ρ0) and L(ρ0) from analyzing the experimental data are much needed.
ISSN:0370-2693
1873-2445
DOI:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.006