Constraining the neutron–proton effective mass splitting using empirical constraints on the density dependence of nuclear symmetry energy around normal density
According to the Hugenholtz–Van Hove theorem, nuclear symmetry energy Esym(ρ) and its slope L(ρ) at an arbitrary density ρ are determined by the nucleon isovector (symmetry) potential Usym(ρ,k) and its momentum dependence ∂Usym∂k. The latter determines uniquely the neutron–proton effective k-mass sp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physics letters. B 2013-11, Vol.727 (1-3), p.276-281 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | According to the Hugenholtz–Van Hove theorem, nuclear symmetry energy Esym(ρ) and its slope L(ρ) at an arbitrary density ρ are determined by the nucleon isovector (symmetry) potential Usym(ρ,k) and its momentum dependence ∂Usym∂k. The latter determines uniquely the neutron–proton effective k-mass splitting mn−p⁎(ρ,δ)≡(mn⁎−mp⁎)/m in neutron-rich nucleonic matter of isospin asymmetry δ. Using currently available constraints on the Esym(ρ0) and L(ρ0) at normal density ρ0 of nuclear matter from 28 recent analyses of various terrestrial nuclear laboratory experiments and astrophysical observations, we try to infer the corresponding neutron–proton effective k-mass splitting mn−p⁎(ρ0,δ). While the mean values of the mn−p⁎(ρ0,δ) obtained from most of the studies are remarkably consistent with each other and scatter very closely around an empirical value of mn−p⁎(ρ0,δ)=0.27⋅δ, it is currently not possible to scientifically state surely that the mn−p⁎(ρ0,δ) is positive within the present knowledge of the uncertainties. Quantifying, better understanding and then further reducing the uncertainties using modern statistical and computational techniques in extracting the Esym(ρ0) and L(ρ0) from analyzing the experimental data are much needed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0370-2693 1873-2445 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.006 |