Heating season performance of a full-scale heat pipe assisted solar wall

► Full-scale prototype achieved maximum daily peak thermal efficiency of 83.7%. ► Average daily peak thermal efficiency was 61.4%. ► Heat delivery to room varied from 163W/m2 on a warm, sunny day to 16.6W/m2 after four days of low insolation. ► FR(τα) and FRUL values for the system were comparable t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy 2013-01, Vol.87, p.76-83
Hauptverfasser: Robinson, Brian S., Chmielewski, Nicholas E., Knox-Kelecy, Andrea, Brehob, Ellen G., Sharp, M. Keith
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Full-scale prototype achieved maximum daily peak thermal efficiency of 83.7%. ► Average daily peak thermal efficiency was 61.4%. ► Heat delivery to room varied from 163W/m2 on a warm, sunny day to 16.6W/m2 after four days of low insolation. ► FR(τα) and FRUL values for the system were comparable to those for glazed liquid active collectors. Previous computer simulations and bench-scale experiments showed that the heat pipe assisted solar wall had the potential for significantly improved performance relative to conventional passive space heating systems. To further test this potential, a full-scale prototype of the heat pipe system was designed, built and installed in a classroom on the University of Louisville campus in Louisville, KY. During the spring heating season of 2010 (January–April), maximum daily peak thermal efficiency was 83.7% and average daily peak thermal efficiency was 61.4%. The maximum hourly average room gain achieved during the season was 163W/m2. On days with good solar insolation, the thermal storage was heated to temperatures sufficient to provide significant energy to the classroom – even during the coldest days of the season. During the longest period (4 days) of low insolation during the season, average hourly heat delivery to the room from storage remained positive, and was never less than 16.6W/m2. During good insolation days following a period of consecutive low insolation days, thermal storage temperature was quickly restored to levels comparable to those obtained during consecutive good insolation days. Estimated heat removal factor * transmittance absorptance product FR(τα) and heat removal factor * overall loss coefficient FRUL values for the system were comparable to those for glazed liquid active collectors.
ISSN:0038-092X
1471-1257
DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2012.10.008