19.4%-efficient large-area fully screen-printed silicon solar cells
We demonstrate industrially feasible large‐area solar cells with passivated homogeneous emitter and rear achieving energy conversion efficiencies of up to 19.4% on 125 × 125 mm2 p‐type 2–3 Ω cm boron‐doped Czochralski silicon wafers. Front and rear metal contacts are fabricated by screen‐printing of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physica status solidi. PSS-RRL. Rapid research letters 2011-04, Vol.5 (4), p.147-149 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We demonstrate industrially feasible large‐area solar cells with passivated homogeneous emitter and rear achieving energy conversion efficiencies of up to 19.4% on 125 × 125 mm2 p‐type 2–3 Ω cm boron‐doped Czochralski silicon wafers. Front and rear metal contacts are fabricated by screen‐printing of silver and aluminum paste and firing in a conventional belt furnace. We implement two different dielectric rear surface passivation stacks: (i) a thermally grown silicon dioxide/silicon nitride stack and (ii) an atomic‐layer‐deposited aluminum oxide/silicon nitride stack. The dielectrics at the rear result in a decreased surface recombination velocity of Srear = 70 cm/s and 80 cm/s, and an increased internal IR reflectance of up to 91% corresponding to an improved Jsc of up to 38.9 mA/cm2 and Voc of up to 664 mV. We observe an increase in cell efficiency of 0.8% absolute for the cells compared to 18.6% efficient reference solar cells featuring a full‐area aluminum back surface field. To our knowledge, the energy conversion efficiency of 19.4% is the best value reported so far for large area screen‐printed solar cells. (© 2011 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
The authors demonstrate an improved energy conversion efficiency up to 19.4% of industrially feasible solar cells with passivated emitter and rear (PERC). As rear surface passivation they use a thermally grown silicon dioxide/silicon nitride stack and an atomic‐layer‐deposited aluminum oxide/silicon nitride stack. A detailed analysis shows a significantly reduced surface recombination velocity and an increased rear reflectance compared to conventional solar cells with full‐area aluminum back surface field (Al‐BSF). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1862-6254 1862-6270 1862-6270 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pssr.201105045 |