Comparison of stepwise demagnetization techniques
To demagnetize small-scale objects (dimensions less than 1 m) fabricated from ferromagnetic materials, it is standard practice to expose the object to a continuous AC applied magnetic field with a steadily decaying amplitude. For objects of dimensions greater than 10 m, there are problems of scale,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on magnetics 2002-07, Vol.38 (4), p.1753-1758 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To demagnetize small-scale objects (dimensions less than 1 m) fabricated from ferromagnetic materials, it is standard practice to expose the object to a continuous AC applied magnetic field with a steadily decaying amplitude. For objects of dimensions greater than 10 m, there are problems of scale, and a stepwise procedure is preferred. We have simulated two different stepwise demagnetization techniques with a scaled model of a magnetic treatment facility regularly used in the deperming of military vessels. We used a steel tube as the model of a ship that was to be demagnetized. For each demagnetization method, we calculated the standard deviation in the final magnetization of the tube. This standard deviation provides a measure of how reproducible the results of the respective techniques are. We find that the standard deviation in final magnetization is improved by a stepwise anhysteretic demagnetization method over the conventional Flash D deperm procedure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-9464 1941-0069 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TMAG.2002.1017767 |