Not all green is as good: Different effects of the natural and cultivated components of urban vegetation on bird and butterfly diversity

•We compared bird and butterfly diversity at different amounts of natural and cultivated greenery.•Bird and butterfly species richness increased with more natural greenery cover.•Bird species richness increased with more cultivated tree cover.•Areas with high natural greenery had more diverse bird a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological conservation 2014-03, Vol.171, p.299-309
Hauptverfasser: Chong, Kwek Yan, Teo, Siyang, Kurukulasuriya, Buddhima, Chung, Yi Fei, Rajathurai, Subaraj, Tan, Hugh Tiang Wah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We compared bird and butterfly diversity at different amounts of natural and cultivated greenery.•Bird and butterfly species richness increased with more natural greenery cover.•Bird species richness increased with more cultivated tree cover.•Areas with high natural greenery had more diverse bird and butterfly communities than areas with high cultivated greenery.•Therefore not all forms of urban greenery will enhance biodiversity to the same extent. It has been suggested that provision of greenery can ameliorate the hostility of the urban environment for wildlife, but greenery can either be in the form of regenerating or remnant patches of natural vegetation, or as cultivated tree, shrub, and ground cover. We test if natural and cultivated greenery differed in their effects on bird and butterfly diversity in the tropical city-state of Singapore, while accounting for the effects of traffic density. Natural vegetation cover was positively correlated to both bird and butterfly species richness. Cultivated tree cover was positively correlated to bird species richness. Meanwhile, ground cover was weakly negatively correlated to bird species richness and overall cultivated greenery cover was weakly positively correlated to butterfly species richness. Increasing road lane density also negatively impacted both bird and butterfly species richness, while there was substantial evidence for an interaction effect between road lane density and cultivated tree cover on bird species richness. Cultivated and natural forms of greenery favoured different assemblages of bird and butterfly species. After controlling for the confounding effects of alpha diversity on community dissimilarity, cultivated greenery was found to produce homogeneous bird and butterfly communities in the urban landscape. Therefore, not all forms of greenery benefit urban biodiversity to the same extent. Management of urban areas to support bird and butterfly wildlife would need to maximise natural or semi-natural cover and only resort to highly-manicured, artificial greenery as a second option, while planning road networks carefully to optimize road lane density.
ISSN:0006-3207
1873-2917
DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.037