Stress-relaxation and fatigue behaviour of synthetic brow-suspension materials

Ptosis describes a low position of the upper eyelid. When this condition is due to poor function of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle, responsible for raising the lid, "brow-suspension" ptosis correction is usually performed, which involves internally attaching the malpositioned eyel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2015-02, Vol.42, p.116-128
Hauptverfasser: Kwon, Kyung-Ah, Shipley, Rebecca J, Edirisinghe, Mohan, Rayment, Andrew W, Best, Serena M, Cameron, Ruth E, Salam, Tahrina, Rose, Geoffrey E, Ezra, Daniel G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ptosis describes a low position of the upper eyelid. When this condition is due to poor function of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle, responsible for raising the lid, "brow-suspension" ptosis correction is usually performed, which involves internally attaching the malpositioned eyelid to the forehead musculature using brow-suspension materials. In service, such materials are exposed to both rapid tensile loading and unloading sequences during blinking, and a more sustained tensile strain during extended periods of closure. In this study, various mechanical tests were conducted to characterise and compare some of commonly-used synthetic brow-suspension materials (Prolene(®), Supramid Extra(®) II, Silicone rods (Visitec(®) Seiff frontalis suspension set) and Mersilene(®) mesh) for their time-dependent response. At a given constant tensile strain or load, all of the brow-suspension materials exhibited stress-relaxation or creep, with Prolene(®) having a statistically different relaxation or creep ratio as compared with those of others. Uniaxial tensile cyclic tests through preconditioning and fatigue tests demonstrated drastically different time-dependent response amongst the various materials. Although the tests generated hysteresis force-strain loops for all materials, the mechanical properties such as the number of cycles required to reach the steady-state, the reduction in the peak force, and the cyclic energy dissipation varied considerably. To reach the steady-state, Prolene(®) and the silicone rod required the greatest and the least number of cycles, respectively. Furthermore, the fatigue tests at physiologically relevant conditions (15% strain controlled at 6.5 Hz) demonstrated that the reduction in the peak force during 100,000 cycles ranged from 15% to 58%, with Prolene(®) and the silicone rod exhibiting the greatest and the least value, respectively. Many factors need to be considered to select the most suitable brow-suspension material for ptosis correction. These novel data on the mechanical time-dependent performance could therefore help to guide clinicians in their decision-making process for optimal surgical outcome.
ISSN:1751-6161
1878-0180
DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.004