Detailed treatment line for a specific landfill leachate remediation. Brief economic assessment
•A combined treatment line for a particular landfill leachate.•Physic-chemical pre-treatment/solar photo-Fenton (DOC 30%)/biotreatment.•Main operating cost comes from H2O2 (72% of total costs).•Total costs were estimated on 43€/m3. Landfill leachate is regarded as a great threat to environment and i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) Switzerland : 1996), 2015-02, Vol.261, p.60-66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •A combined treatment line for a particular landfill leachate.•Physic-chemical pre-treatment/solar photo-Fenton (DOC 30%)/biotreatment.•Main operating cost comes from H2O2 (72% of total costs).•Total costs were estimated on 43€/m3.
Landfill leachate is regarded as a great threat to environment and its remediation is very complicated task due to its recalcitrant nature. Consequently, strategies based on integrated physic-chemical–biological techniques must be evaluated. This work propounds a combined treatment line for a particular landfill leachate, consisting of a preliminary physic-chemical stage followed by an Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) by means of solar photo-Fenton and a final conventional biotreatment. Additionally, an economic evaluation of the proposed treatment line is presented. The results obtained for a landfill leachate sample containing a high organic load (landfill leachate of around 40g/L as COD and 15g/L as DOC) revealed that this technologies combination is effective reducing recalcitrant organic content after the conditioning step (17% DOC removal), requiring then a solar photo-Fenton (Fe 1mM) treatment time of 11h that generates a non-toxic and biodegradable effluent mineralization percentage needed to achieve an appropriate biodegradability was 27%, requiring a consumption of 22g H2O2/L. Total costs have been assessed in around 40€/m3. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1385-8947 1873-3212 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.103 |