The effect of facilitated tucking on procedural pain control among premature babies

Aims and Objectives To determine the effectiveness of facilitated tucking in reducing pain when venepuncture is being performed on preterm infants. Background Preterm neonates are exposed to a myriad of invasive, often painful, procedures throughout their stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical nursing 2015-01, Vol.24 (1-2), p.183-191
Hauptverfasser: Lopez, Olive, Subramanian, Pathmawathi, Rahmat, Norsiah, Theam, Lim Chin, Chinna, Karuthan, Rosli, Roshaslina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims and Objectives To determine the effectiveness of facilitated tucking in reducing pain when venepuncture is being performed on preterm infants. Background Preterm neonates are exposed to a myriad of invasive, often painful, procedures throughout their stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. A growing volume of evidence shows that pain in preterm infants has both short‐ and long‐term deleterious effects. It is within the power and ethical responsibility of neonatal nurses to help premature babies cope with procedural pain. Design A quasi‐experimental study with two groups: control and treatment group. Methods A study was conducted on a cohort of preterm infants (n = 42), divided into control (n = 21) and treatment (n = 21) groups, to determine the effect of facilitated tucking on pain relief during venepuncture on preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. The severity of pain was measured using the Premature Infant Pain Profile score. The primary outcome measure was reduction in the Premature Infant Pain Profile scores. Results The Premature Infant Pain Profile score for the treatment group was significantly lower (M = 6·62, SD 2·598) than for the control group (6·62 ± 2·60 vs. 8·52 ± 2·99, respectively, t = −2·202, p 
ISSN:0962-1067
1365-2702
DOI:10.1111/jocn.12657