Pharyngostomy
A retrospective analysis of a prospective observational study of a cohort of patients who required prolonged foregut/midgut decompression/intraluminal stenting and/or enteral nutritional support was conducted. Those patients were intolerant of protracted nasogastric intubation. They also manifested...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2015-04, Vol.81 (4), p.349-353 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A retrospective analysis of a prospective observational study of a cohort of patients who required prolonged foregut/midgut decompression/intraluminal stenting and/or enteral nutritional support was conducted. Those patients were intolerant of protracted nasogastric intubation. They also manifested hostile peritoneal cavities and therefore were not candidates for a laparoendoscopic gastrostomy or jejunostomy. Accordingly, they underwent insertion of a pharyngogastric or pharyngojejunal tube. With patients properly positioned and anesthetized and with attention to the anatomy of the superior carotid cervical triangle, those pharyngostomies and cannulations were performed safely and efficiently. The tubes remained indefinitely or were changed/removed ad libitum. Morbidity was nil and no mortality attributable to the procedure was observed. Pharyngostomy should be part of the armamentarium of all general surgeons. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
DOI: | 10.1177/000313481508100423 |