Autofluorescence in samples obtained from chronic biofilm infections – “all that glitters is not gold”

When looking at tissue sections of ex vivo samples, autofluorescence can be a major cause of artifacts and misinterpretations. We here reiterate evidence that autofluorescing granules, often hemosiderin but also ceroid or mucinogen granules, are severe obstacles when imaging and diagnosing biofilm i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pathogens and disease 2015-06, Vol.73 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Eickhardt, Steffen, Kragh, Kasper N., Schrøder, Stine, Poulsen, Steen Seier, Sillesen, Henrik, Givskov, Michael, Høiby, Niels, Bjarnsholt, Thomas, Alhede, Morten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Pathogens and disease
container_volume 73
creator Eickhardt, Steffen
Kragh, Kasper N.
Schrøder, Stine
Poulsen, Steen Seier
Sillesen, Henrik
Givskov, Michael
Høiby, Niels
Bjarnsholt, Thomas
Alhede, Morten
description When looking at tissue sections of ex vivo samples, autofluorescence can be a major cause of artifacts and misinterpretations. We here reiterate evidence that autofluorescing granules, often hemosiderin but also ceroid or mucinogen granules, are severe obstacles when imaging and diagnosing biofilm infections through fluorescent imaging techniques. We used confocal laser scanning microscopy with spectral analysis for autofluorescence detection as well as standard histological stains in order to identify the culprit and show that these granules might very well be mistaken for bacterial biofilms. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the increased amount of autofluorescing granules may be a consequence of prolonged inflammation as a consequence of chronic biofilm infections. The article describes how autofluorescence can influence biofilm diagnostics in patient samples as well as discussing the cause of this autofluorescence.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/femspd/ftv012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669835396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/femspd/ftv012</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2305898044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-77d1324c8bb7e9069f263eba908d5b676bb6ddd0216dd19517b4ad14dbf3315d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouqx79CoBL17qJk2bNsdl8QsELwreStIkGkmbmqSCt_0PXvXP-UuMrF94cWCYGXh4mZkXgD2MjjBiZK5VFwY51_ER4XwDTHJUsIyS_GbzV78DZiHcoxR1ieuKboOdvKSUkIJOgF2M0Wk7Oq9Cq_pWQdPDwLvBqgCdiNz0SkLtXQfbO-9600JhnDa2S6BWbTSuD_Bt9ZzyhVsL4x2P8NaaGJUP0ATYuzQ7K99Wr7tgS3Mb1OyzTsH1yfHV8iy7uDw9Xy4uspYwErOqkpjkRVsLUSmGKNM5JUpwhmpZClpRIaiUEuU4FcxKXImCS1xIoQnBpSRTcLjWHbx7GFWITWfSddbyXrkxNJhSVpOSMJrQgz_ovRt9n7ZrcoLKmtWoKBKVranWuxC80s3gTcf9U4NR8-FEs3aiWTuR-P1P1VF0Sn7TX3__2dCNwz9a70wWl7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2305898044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autofluorescence in samples obtained from chronic biofilm infections – “all that glitters is not gold”</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Eickhardt, Steffen ; Kragh, Kasper N. ; Schrøder, Stine ; Poulsen, Steen Seier ; Sillesen, Henrik ; Givskov, Michael ; Høiby, Niels ; Bjarnsholt, Thomas ; Alhede, Morten</creator><creatorcontrib>Eickhardt, Steffen ; Kragh, Kasper N. ; Schrøder, Stine ; Poulsen, Steen Seier ; Sillesen, Henrik ; Givskov, Michael ; Høiby, Niels ; Bjarnsholt, Thomas ; Alhede, Morten</creatorcontrib><description>When looking at tissue sections of ex vivo samples, autofluorescence can be a major cause of artifacts and misinterpretations. We here reiterate evidence that autofluorescing granules, often hemosiderin but also ceroid or mucinogen granules, are severe obstacles when imaging and diagnosing biofilm infections through fluorescent imaging techniques. We used confocal laser scanning microscopy with spectral analysis for autofluorescence detection as well as standard histological stains in order to identify the culprit and show that these granules might very well be mistaken for bacterial biofilms. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the increased amount of autofluorescing granules may be a consequence of prolonged inflammation as a consequence of chronic biofilm infections. The article describes how autofluorescence can influence biofilm diagnostics in patient samples as well as discussing the cause of this autofluorescence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-632X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-632X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftv012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25663346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Bacteria - chemistry ; Biofilms ; Biofilms - growth &amp; development ; Confocal microscopy ; Diagnostic Errors ; Fluorescence ; Fluoroscopic imaging ; Granular materials ; Imaging techniques ; Infections ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Optical Imaging - methods ; Pathology - methods ; Scanning microscopy ; Spectral analysis ; Spectrum Analysis</subject><ispartof>Pathogens and disease, 2015-06, Vol.73 (4)</ispartof><rights>FEMS 2015. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2015</rights><rights>FEMS 2015. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>FEMS 2015. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-77d1324c8bb7e9069f263eba908d5b676bb6ddd0216dd19517b4ad14dbf3315d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-77d1324c8bb7e9069f263eba908d5b676bb6ddd0216dd19517b4ad14dbf3315d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1599,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftv012$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25663346$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eickhardt, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kragh, Kasper N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrøder, Stine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Steen Seier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sillesen, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Givskov, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Høiby, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjarnsholt, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhede, Morten</creatorcontrib><title>Autofluorescence in samples obtained from chronic biofilm infections – “all that glitters is not gold”</title><title>Pathogens and disease</title><addtitle>Pathog Dis</addtitle><description>When looking at tissue sections of ex vivo samples, autofluorescence can be a major cause of artifacts and misinterpretations. We here reiterate evidence that autofluorescing granules, often hemosiderin but also ceroid or mucinogen granules, are severe obstacles when imaging and diagnosing biofilm infections through fluorescent imaging techniques. We used confocal laser scanning microscopy with spectral analysis for autofluorescence detection as well as standard histological stains in order to identify the culprit and show that these granules might very well be mistaken for bacterial biofilms. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the increased amount of autofluorescing granules may be a consequence of prolonged inflammation as a consequence of chronic biofilm infections. The article describes how autofluorescence can influence biofilm diagnostics in patient samples as well as discussing the cause of this autofluorescence.</description><subject>Bacteria - chemistry</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biofilms - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Confocal microscopy</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluoroscopic imaging</subject><subject>Granular materials</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Optical Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Pathology - methods</subject><subject>Scanning microscopy</subject><subject>Spectral analysis</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis</subject><issn>2049-632X</issn><issn>2049-632X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouqx79CoBL17qJk2bNsdl8QsELwreStIkGkmbmqSCt_0PXvXP-UuMrF94cWCYGXh4mZkXgD2MjjBiZK5VFwY51_ER4XwDTHJUsIyS_GbzV78DZiHcoxR1ieuKboOdvKSUkIJOgF2M0Wk7Oq9Cq_pWQdPDwLvBqgCdiNz0SkLtXQfbO-9600JhnDa2S6BWbTSuD_Bt9ZzyhVsL4x2P8NaaGJUP0ATYuzQ7K99Wr7tgS3Mb1OyzTsH1yfHV8iy7uDw9Xy4uspYwErOqkpjkRVsLUSmGKNM5JUpwhmpZClpRIaiUEuU4FcxKXImCS1xIoQnBpSRTcLjWHbx7GFWITWfSddbyXrkxNJhSVpOSMJrQgz_ovRt9n7ZrcoLKmtWoKBKVranWuxC80s3gTcf9U4NR8-FEs3aiWTuR-P1P1VF0Sn7TX3__2dCNwz9a70wWl7M</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Eickhardt, Steffen</creator><creator>Kragh, Kasper N.</creator><creator>Schrøder, Stine</creator><creator>Poulsen, Steen Seier</creator><creator>Sillesen, Henrik</creator><creator>Givskov, Michael</creator><creator>Høiby, Niels</creator><creator>Bjarnsholt, Thomas</creator><creator>Alhede, Morten</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Autofluorescence in samples obtained from chronic biofilm infections – “all that glitters is not gold”</title><author>Eickhardt, Steffen ; Kragh, Kasper N. ; Schrøder, Stine ; Poulsen, Steen Seier ; Sillesen, Henrik ; Givskov, Michael ; Høiby, Niels ; Bjarnsholt, Thomas ; Alhede, Morten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-77d1324c8bb7e9069f263eba908d5b676bb6ddd0216dd19517b4ad14dbf3315d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - chemistry</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biofilms - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Confocal microscopy</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluoroscopic imaging</topic><topic>Granular materials</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Optical Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Pathology - methods</topic><topic>Scanning microscopy</topic><topic>Spectral analysis</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eickhardt, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kragh, Kasper N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrøder, Stine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Steen Seier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sillesen, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Givskov, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Høiby, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjarnsholt, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhede, Morten</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pathogens and disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eickhardt, Steffen</au><au>Kragh, Kasper N.</au><au>Schrøder, Stine</au><au>Poulsen, Steen Seier</au><au>Sillesen, Henrik</au><au>Givskov, Michael</au><au>Høiby, Niels</au><au>Bjarnsholt, Thomas</au><au>Alhede, Morten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Autofluorescence in samples obtained from chronic biofilm infections – “all that glitters is not gold”</atitle><jtitle>Pathogens and disease</jtitle><addtitle>Pathog Dis</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2049-632X</issn><eissn>2049-632X</eissn><abstract>When looking at tissue sections of ex vivo samples, autofluorescence can be a major cause of artifacts and misinterpretations. We here reiterate evidence that autofluorescing granules, often hemosiderin but also ceroid or mucinogen granules, are severe obstacles when imaging and diagnosing biofilm infections through fluorescent imaging techniques. We used confocal laser scanning microscopy with spectral analysis for autofluorescence detection as well as standard histological stains in order to identify the culprit and show that these granules might very well be mistaken for bacterial biofilms. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the increased amount of autofluorescing granules may be a consequence of prolonged inflammation as a consequence of chronic biofilm infections. The article describes how autofluorescence can influence biofilm diagnostics in patient samples as well as discussing the cause of this autofluorescence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>25663346</pmid><doi>10.1093/femspd/ftv012</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2049-632X
ispartof Pathogens and disease, 2015-06, Vol.73 (4)
issn 2049-632X
2049-632X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669835396
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Bacteria - chemistry
Biofilms
Biofilms - growth & development
Confocal microscopy
Diagnostic Errors
Fluorescence
Fluoroscopic imaging
Granular materials
Imaging techniques
Infections
Microscopy, Confocal
Optical Imaging - methods
Pathology - methods
Scanning microscopy
Spectral analysis
Spectrum Analysis
title Autofluorescence in samples obtained from chronic biofilm infections – “all that glitters is not gold”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T03%3A50%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autofluorescence%20in%20samples%20obtained%20from%20chronic%20biofilm%20infections%20%E2%80%93%20%E2%80%9Call%20that%20glitters%20is%20not%20gold%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Pathogens%20and%20disease&rft.au=Eickhardt,%20Steffen&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2049-632X&rft.eissn=2049-632X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/femspd/ftv012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2305898044%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2305898044&rft_id=info:pmid/25663346&rft_oup_id=10.1093/femspd/ftv012&rfr_iscdi=true