Autofluorescence in samples obtained from chronic biofilm infections – “all that glitters is not gold”
When looking at tissue sections of ex vivo samples, autofluorescence can be a major cause of artifacts and misinterpretations. We here reiterate evidence that autofluorescing granules, often hemosiderin but also ceroid or mucinogen granules, are severe obstacles when imaging and diagnosing biofilm i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pathogens and disease 2015-06, Vol.73 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | When looking at tissue sections of ex vivo samples, autofluorescence can be a major cause of artifacts and misinterpretations. We here reiterate evidence that autofluorescing granules, often hemosiderin but also ceroid or mucinogen granules, are severe obstacles when imaging and diagnosing biofilm infections through fluorescent imaging techniques. We used confocal laser scanning microscopy with spectral analysis for autofluorescence detection as well as standard histological stains in order to identify the culprit and show that these granules might very well be mistaken for bacterial biofilms. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the increased amount of autofluorescing granules may be a consequence of prolonged inflammation as a consequence of chronic biofilm infections.
The article describes how autofluorescence can influence biofilm diagnostics in patient samples as well as discussing the cause of this autofluorescence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2049-632X 2049-632X |
DOI: | 10.1093/femspd/ftv012 |