The Effectiveness of Two Community-Based Weight Loss Strategies among Obese, Low-Income US Latinos

Abstract Background Latino immigrants have high rates of obesity and face barriers to weight loss. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a case-management (CM) intervention with and without community health workers (CHWs) for weight loss. Design This was a 2-year, randomized controlled trial co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2015-04, Vol.115 (4), p.537-550.e2
Hauptverfasser: Rosas, Lisa Goldman, MPH, PhD, Thiyagarajan, Sreedevi, MS, Goldstein, Benjamin Alan, MPH, PhD, Drieling, Rebecca Lucia, MPH, MMQ, Romero, Priscilla Padilla, MPH, MPP, Ma, Jun, MD, PhD, Yank, Veronica, MD, Stafford, Randall Scott, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Latino immigrants have high rates of obesity and face barriers to weight loss. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a case-management (CM) intervention with and without community health workers (CHWs) for weight loss. Design This was a 2-year, randomized controlled trial comparing two interventions with each other and with usual care (UC). Participants/setting Eligible participants included Latinos with a body mass index of 30 to 60 and one or more heart disease risk factors. The 207 participants recruited during 2009-2010 had a mean age of 47 years and were mostly women (77%). At 24 months, 86% of the sample was assessed. Intervention The CM+CHW (n=82) and CM (n=84) interventions were compared with each other and with UC (n=41). Both included an intensive 12-month phase followed by 12 months of maintenance. The CM+CHW group received home visits. Main outcome measures Weight change at 24 months. Statistical analyses Generalized estimating equations using intent-to-treat. Results At 6 months, mean weight loss in the CM+CHW arm was −2.1 kg (95% CI −2.8 to −1.3) or −2% of baseline weight (95% CI −1% to −2%) compared with −1.6 kg (95% CI −2.4 to −0.7; % weight change, −2%, −1%, and −3%) in CM and −0.9 kg (95% CI −1.8 to 0.1; % weight change, −1%, 0%, and −2%) in UC. By 12 and 24 months, differences narrowed and CM+CHW was no longer statistically distinct. Men achieved greater weight loss than women in all groups at each time point ( P
ISSN:2212-2672
2212-2680
DOI:10.1016/j.jand.2014.10.020