Cardiorespiratory Responses to Stationary Running in Water and on Land

The aim of the study was to compare maximal and submaximal cardiorespiratory responses between progressive tests on a treadmill on land (TRE), and stationary running on land (SRL) and in water (SRW), while also comparing two methods of determining the second turn point (ST) (ventilatory curve and he...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sports science & medicine 2013-01, Vol.12 (3), p.694-600
Hauptverfasser: Kruel, Luiz Fernando M, Beilke, Debora D, Kanitz, Ana C, Alberton, Cristine L, Antunes, Amanda H, Pantoja, Patricia D, da Silva, Eduardo M, Pinto, Stephanie S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of the study was to compare maximal and submaximal cardiorespiratory responses between progressive tests on a treadmill on land (TRE), and stationary running on land (SRL) and in water (SRW), while also comparing two methods of determining the second turn point (ST) (ventilatory curve and heart rate deflection point). The study sample consisted of nine active women (23 + or - 1.94 years) that performed three maximal protocols in separate days. Heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (VO sub(2)) were measured in all sessions. The data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test. Greater values of maximal HR (HR sub(max)) and HR at ST (HR sub(ST)) were observed during exercise performed on TRE and during the SRL, compared to the SRW (p < 0.05). The results for maximal VO sub(2) (VO sub(2max)) and VO sub(2) at ST (VO sub(2ST)) showed greater and significant values on TRE compared to STL and STW (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the HR and VO sub(2) corresponding to the ST showed similar values between the two methods. Thus, the main conclusion of the present study was that the HR deflection point seems to be a simple and practical alternative method for determining the ST in all protocols analyzed.
ISSN:1303-2968
1303-2968