Three-dimensional quantification and visualization of aortic calcification by multidetector-row computed tomography: A simple approach using a volume-rendering method

Abstract Objective : Three-dimensional (3-D) visualization and quantification of vascular calcification (VC) are important to accelerate the multidisciplinary investigation of VC. Agatston scoring is the standard approach for evaluating coronary artery calcification. However, regarding aortic calcif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atherosclerosis 2015-04, Vol.239 (2), p.622-628
Hauptverfasser: Mori, Shumpei, Takaya, Tomofumi, Kinugasa, Mitsuo, Ito, Tatsuro, Takamine, Sachiko, Fujiwara, Sei, Nishii, Tatsuya, Kono, Atsushi K, Inoue, Takeshi, Satomi-Kobayashi, Seimi, Rikitake, Yoshiyuki, Okita, Yutaka, Hirata, Ken-ichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective : Three-dimensional (3-D) visualization and quantification of vascular calcification (VC) are important to accelerate the multidisciplinary investigation of VC. Agatston scoring is the standard approach for evaluating coronary artery calcification. However, regarding aortic calcification (AC), quantification methods appear to vary among studies. The aim of this study was to introduce a simple technique of simultaneous quantification and 3-D visualization of AC and provide validation data. Methods : The main study comprised of 126 patients who underwent the thoracoabdominal plain computed tomography scan as preoperative general evaluation. AC was quantified using a volume-rendering (VR) method (VR AC volume) by extracting the volume with a density ≥130 HU within the total aorta. The concordance and reproducibility of the VR AC volume were validated in comparison with the conventional slice-by-slice voxel-based AC quantification (volumetric AC score) using the Agatston scoring software. Results : Excellent concordance between the VR AC volume and volumetric AC score was confirmed (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.9997, mean difference = −0.05 ± 0.23 mL, p  
ISSN:0021-9150
1879-1484
DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.041