Mechanical and photoelastic analysis of four different fixation methods for mandibular body fractures
Abstract Objective The aim of the present study was to compare four methods of fixation in mandibular body fractures. Study design Mechanical and photoelastic tests were performed using polyurethane and photoelastic resin mandibles, respectively. The study groups contained the following: (I), two mi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2015-04, Vol.43 (3), p.306-311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objective The aim of the present study was to compare four methods of fixation in mandibular body fractures. Study design Mechanical and photoelastic tests were performed using polyurethane and photoelastic resin mandibles, respectively. The study groups contained the following: (I), two miniplates of 2.0 mm; (II) one 2.0 mm plate and an Erich arch bar; (III) one 2.4 mm plate and an Erich arch bar, and (IV) one 2.0 mm plate and one 2.4 mm plate. The differences between the mean values were analyzed using Tukey's test, the Mann–Whitney test and the Bonferroni correction. Results Group II recorded the lowest resistance, followed by groups I, IV and III. The photoelastic test confirmed the increase of tension in group II. Conclusion The 2.4 mm system board in linear mandibular body fractures provided more resistance and the use of only one 2.0 mm plate in the central area of the mandible created higher tension. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1010-5182 1878-4119 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.021 |