Developing a parametric ear model for auricular reconstruction: A new step towards patient-specific implants

Abstract Introduction Ear reconstruction is a tedious and demanding surgical procedure and the implant framework used is essential for the esthetic result. The outcome of a reconstructed ear, however, is not necessarily limited to the implant shape but rather to the available options of transplantab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2015-04, Vol.43 (3), p.390-395
Hauptverfasser: Bos, E.J, Scholten, T, Song, Y, Verlinden, J.C, Wolff, J, Forouzanfar, T, Helder, M.N, van Zuijlen, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Ear reconstruction is a tedious and demanding surgical procedure and the implant framework used is essential for the esthetic result. The outcome of a reconstructed ear, however, is not necessarily limited to the implant shape but rather to the available options of transplantable tissue for coverage. Apart from the visual aesthetics, ear reconstruction subsequently also requires implant dimensions to be adapted to the surgical possibilities. In this article, we have brought different disciplines together to develop a customizable ear model for 3D printing of ear implants. Material and methods Computed tomography (CT) scans were made of 4 human cadaver ears before and after soft tissue dissection using a Discovery 750 High Definition Freedom Edition scanner (GE, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and subsequently converted into an STL data set using Mimics Software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). These scans were then used to develop a fully adjustable parametric model based on the essential ear anatomy using Rhinoceros and Grasshopper software. Results To determine the quality of the developed models, directed Hausdorff distance (DHD) was applied as the basis for measuring the similarity between the parametric model and the ear cartilage scanning data. Two methods were used. The mean directed Haussdorff distance (MDHD) was calculated based on the distribution of point sets showing an average similarity of 0.8 mm (±0.05 mm). The mean similarity coefficient (SC) of the model and scan surfaces was 94% with a 2-mm threshold. Conclusion This study shows that a parametric standard model could be used as a feasible method to generate custom implants based on existing ear images.
ISSN:1010-5182
1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2014.12.016